On Mon, 18 May 2026 14:10:38 +0200,
Stuart Henderson <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > I think we should import it as is but not link to the build, what should
> > make works on actualize PLIST much simpler and distributed.
>
> Ah yes, that does make sense. In that case, please add a commented-out
> line to ../Makefile so that it's clear that it was done on purpose.
> I'm ok with doing that.
>
> Maybe add a list of archs that were checked to a comment in 16/Makefile?
>
I think we can use list of bootstraps as a proof where it was tested?
Also, I think the right step is move *-bootstrap to Makefile.inc like that,
but I don't like it because it looks ugly, and I not sure that reformat file
is good idea.
Index: Makefile.inc
===================================================================
RCS file: /home/cvs/ports/lang/gcc/Makefile.inc,v
diff -u -p -r1.23 Makefile.inc
--- Makefile.inc 12 Dec 2025 18:19:46 -0000 1.23
+++ Makefile.inc 18 May 2026 13:37:42 -0000
@@ -16,6 +16,7 @@ COMMENT-objc= ${COM}: obj C compiler
COMMENT-ada= ${COM}: Ada compiler
COMMENT-go= ${COM}: Go compiler
COMMENT-dlang= ${COM}: D compiler
+COMMENT-bootstrap= ${COM}: binary bootstrap
PKGNAME?= gcc-${FULL_PKGVERSION}
PKGNAME-libs?= gcc-libs-${FULL_PKGVERSION}
@@ -26,6 +27,7 @@ PKGNAME-objc?= gobjc-${FULL_PKGVERSION}
PKGNAME-ada?= gnat-${FULL_PKGVERSION}
PKGNAME-go?= gccgo-${FULL_PKGVERSION}
PKGNAME-dlang?= gdc-${FULL_PKGVERSION}
+PKGNAME-bootstrap?= gcc-bootstrap-${FULL_PKGVERSION}
DESCR-main ?= ${PORTSDIR}/lang/gcc/DESCR
DESCR-libs ?= ${PORTSDIR}/lang/gcc/DESCR-libs
@@ -36,6 +38,7 @@ DESCR-objc ?= ${PORTSDIR}/lang/gcc/DESCR
DESCR-ada ?= ${PORTSDIR}/lang/gcc/DESCR-ada
DESCR-go ?= ${PORTSDIR}/lang/gcc/DESCR-go
DESCR-dlang ?= ${PORTSDIR}/lang/gcc/DESCR-dlang
+DESCR-bootstrap ?= ${PORTSDIR}/lang/gcc/DESCR-bootstrap
HOMEPAGE?= https://gcc.gnu.org/
--
wbr, Kirill
