On Sun, 24 May 2026 18:12:21 +0200, Christoph Liebender <[email protected]> wrote: > > [1 <text/plain; UTF-8 (7bit)>] > On 5/23/26 18:52, Kirill A. Korinsky wrote: > > > > Few feedbacks: > > > > 1. Some of their servers' DNS are missconfigured: > > > > ~ $ host uk1.backend.librespeed.org 1.1.1.1 > > Using domain server: > > Name: 1.1.1.1 > > Address: 1.1.1.1#53 > > Aliases: > > > > uk1.backend.librespeed.org has address 37.61.238.196 > > Host uk1.backend.librespeed.org not found: 2(SERVFAIL) > > Host uk1.backend.librespeed.org not found: 2(SERVFAIL) > > ~ $ host za1.backend.librespeed.org 1.1.1.1 > > Using domain server: > > Name: 1.1.1.1 > > Address: 1.1.1.1#53 > > Aliases: > > > > za1.backend.librespeed.org has address 160.119.254.207 > > Host za1.backend.librespeed.org not found: 2(SERVFAIL) > > Host za1.backend.librespeed.org not found: 2(SERVFAIL) > > ~ $ > > > > 2. It lies about speed at least where I am right now: > > > > $ librespeed-cli > > Retrieving server list from > > https://librespeed.org/backend-servers/servers.php > > Selecting the fastest server based on ping > > Selected server: Poznan, Poland (INEA) [speedtest.kamilszczepanski.com] > > Sponsored by: Kamil Szczepa?ski @ https://kamilszczepanski.com > > You're testing from: XXX - Unknown ISP > > Ping: 24.18 ms Jitter: 4.08 ms > > Download rate: 99.47 Mbps > > Upload rate: 182.29 Mbps > > > > but here 1Gbps / 50mbps Kabel connection, so, 200 Mbps upload looks > > impossible. > > Well, AFAIK librespeed is backed by volunteers. So YMMV. > > > > > Anyway portwise reads good. > > > > Thanks for the feedback. Attached is a new version with pledge/unveil > calls to add a sandbox. After all, librespeed connects and downloads > random things from random servers. > > I'm willing to take MAINTAINER if imported with patches. > [2 librespeed-cli.tgz <application/octet-stream (base64)>]
Retested, still works. It smals, builds fast and seems good way to measure some speed. OK kirill@ to import -- wbr, Kirill
