On Tue, Jun 23, 2026 at 04:39:06PM +0200, Kirill A. Korinsky wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Jun 2026 16:23:44 +0200,
> Marc Espie <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > Here is a simple reproducer for the issue
> >
> > Index: Makefile
> > ===================================================================
> > RCS file: /build/data/openbsd/cvs/src/regress/usr.sbin/pkg_add/Makefile,v
> > diff -u -p -r1.90 Makefile
> > --- Makefile 14 Sep 2025 18:41:11 -0000 1.90
> > +++ Makefile 23 Jun 2026 14:22:49 -0000
> > @@ -13,14 +13,14 @@ REGRESS_TARGETS=pkgnames pkgpaths signat
> > tying-1 tying-2 tag-delete setsprint temp-error1 \
> > temp-error2 temp-error2-as-root temp-error3 temp-error4 \
> > cksum-error system-version XXX-warning symlink no-symlink \
> > - oldlib2 lib-error
> > + oldlib2 lib-error gcc15
> >
>
> And after switch to gcc16 or gcc17... shall it be renamed?
>
> > REGRESS_ROOT_TARGETS = temp-error2-as-root
> >
> > # lots of tests that really require a vstat overhaul
> > REGRESS_EXPECTED_FAILURES = collision-check1 collision-check2 \
> > collision-check5 collision-check6 collision-check7 \
> > - exotest tying-2
> > + exotest tying-2 gcc15
> >
> > PERLSCRIPT = perl -I ${.CURDIR} ${.CURDIR}
> >
> > @@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ D$i ?= ${.OBJDIR}/dest$i
> > DEST$i ?= ${D$i}/usr/local
> > .endfor
> >
> > -# current maxes (used): D49, SRC30, plist28, rep7
> > +# current maxes (used): D49, SRC30, plist28, rep9
> > pkgnames:
> > ${PERLSCRIPT}/check-name
> >
> > @@ -338,7 +338,8 @@ rep0/gb-0.tgz rep1/gb-0p0.tgz rep0/gd-0.
> > rep0/gf-1.tgz rep1/gf-0.tgz \
> > rep1/missc-0.tgz rep0/q5-0.tgz rep1/q5-1.tgz \
> > rep0/ma-0.tgz rep1/ma-1.tgz rep0/mc-0.tgz rep1/me-1.tgz \
> > -rep0/tcl-8.5.7.tgz:
> > +rep0/tcl-8.5.7.tgz rep8/gcc-libs-15.tgz rep9/gcc-libs-15.tgz \
> > +rep9/gcc-libs-16.tgz:
> > @${CREATE_PKG} ${EMPTY} $@
> >
> > rep0/md-0.tgz:
> > @@ -783,6 +784,8 @@ rep7/avahi-glib-1.tgz: plist26
> > rep7/cups-1.tgz:
> > @${CREATE_PKG} ${WAVE_PLIST} -P't/avahi-libs:avahi-libs-*:avahi-libs-0'
> > -P't/avahi-glib:avahi-glib-*:avahi-glib-1' -W avahi.0.0 ${EMPTY} $@
> >
> > +rep8/cfitsio-0.tgz rep9/cfitsio-0.tgz:
> > + @${CREATE_PKG} -P't/gcc-libs-15:gcc-libs->=15,<16:gcc-libs-15' ${EMPTY}
> > $@
> >
> > rep0/sym-0.tgz: plist19
> > @mkdir -p ${SRC30}
> > @@ -837,6 +840,13 @@ lib-error: plist28
> > @rm -f lib-error.out
> > @if ${CREATE_PKG} -B src30 -f plist28 bad-package-0 2>lib-error.out;
> > then exit 1; fi
> > @diff -u lib-error.out ${.CURDIR}/lib-error.ref
> > +
> > +gcc15: rep8/cfitsio-0.tgz rep8/gcc-libs-15.tgz \
> > + rep9/cfitsio-0.tgz rep9/gcc-libs-15.tgz rep9/gcc-libs-16.tgz
> > + @-rm -rf ${D50}
> > + @ROOT=${D50} ${ADD_PKG} rep8/cfitsio-0.tgz
> > + @ROOT=${D50} PKG_PATH=${.OBJDIR}/rep9 ${ADD_PKG} -u 2>&1|head -100 |tee
> > error-loop.out
> > + @if [ `wc -l <error-loop.out` -eq 100 ]; then exit 1; fi
> >
> > clean:
> > -rm -rf rep* dest* plist* src* signatures.out *.ref *.out
> >
>
> --
> wbr, Kirill
>
>
Nope, it's a regression test. It exemplifies a specific issue, that's all
