On 2026/07/22 08:24, Andrew Kloet wrote:
> Resending to the ports@, accidentally sent direct to the author earlier.
>
> On Wed Jul 22, 2026 at 7:33 AM EDT, David Uhden Collado wrote:
> > The unveil support added in the latest i2pd release does not account for
> > the fact that OpenBSD commonly uses /var instead of /var/lib.
> >
> > I had to make a small code change so that unveil works correctly with
> > the default paths used by the OpenBSD port.
>
> I looked at the upstream implementation for pledge/unveil. It's riddled
> with errors, typos, and wicked code smells. It's quite frankly appalling
> that it got merged. It's apparent it was merged with little to no
> testing. It will cause problems.
>
> I encourage you to take a look at it yourself. [1]
eurgh.
pledge("stdio rpath wpath cpath inet dns unix recvfd sendfd proc error mcast
chown flock",nullptr);
this is completely bloody pointless.
> > bool openbsd_unevil_enabled;
> Seriously?
>
> I'm going to rewrite it for upstream.
>
> [1] https://github.com/PurpleI2P/i2pd/pull/2403
>
> --
> Andrew
