On 2026-08-30 09:07, Thomas Kupper wrote:
> Good Morning,
> 
> A few days ago chrony 4.9 was released with support for OpenBSD including 
> pledge(2) support and support for refclock driver for OpenBSD timedelta 
> sensors.
> 
> I'd very much welcome feedback and testing of chrony.
> 
> For anyone not knowing what chrony is used for, here a short introduction:
> 
> chrony is a versatile implementation of the Network Time Protocol (NTP). It 
> can synchronise the system clock with NTP servers, reference clocks (e.g. GPS 
> receiver), and manual input using wristwatch and keyboard. It can also 
> operate as an NTPv4 (RFC 5905) server and peer to provide a time service to 
> other computers in the network.
> 
> The news about 4.9 (and previous versions) can be found at :
>       https://chrony-project.org/news.html
> 
> Find attached the OpenBSD ports archive for it.
> 
> It run under the user _chrony which would have to be added to the user.list 
> beforehand with user ID 906, the lowest unused ID as of today/2026-08-30.
> 
> ---
> diff -us infrastructure/db/user.list{.orig,}
> --- infrastructure/db/user.list.orig  Sun Aug 30 07:49:54 2026
> +++ infrastructure/db/user.list       Sun Aug 30 07:49:15 2026
> @@ -414,3 +414,4 @@
>  903 _iaxmodem                _iaxmodem       telephony/iaxmodem
>  904 _neighbot                _neighbot       net/neighbot
>  905 _pgweb           _pgweb          www/pgweb
> +906 _chrony          _chrony         net/chrony
> ---
> 
> The archive's content corresponds to tag 4.9 on my git repo
> https://git.sr.ht/~patient0/chrony-OpenBSD-ports
> 
> A note regarding dependencies:
> 
> - it links against gnutls and nettle. On -current gnutls links against
>   nettle 4 (security/nettle) and that is how this port is setup at the
>   moment.
>   On OpenBSD < 8.0 gnutls links against nettle 3, named
>   security/libnettle. If one wants to compile chrony for OpenBSD < 8.0
>   you would have to change the Makefile accordingly.
>   Does it make sense to adapt the Makefile to handle this situation or
>   is handling -current only recommended?
> 
> 
> Have an excellent Sunday
> /Thomas

Hey Thomas, thanks!

I'm already testing your port (on -current) and it works for me :). Good job!

Have a wonderfull Sunday,
Atanas 

Reply via email to