David Leadbeater <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Sep 09, 2026 at 10:12:33AM +1000, David Leadbeater wrote: > [...] > > ...therefore I don't think the translation is needed, only this allowing > > setting IP_TOS for AF_INET6 (i.e. just the kern_pledge.c change > > in the diff). > > When I say "allowing" I mean not resulting in a pledge failure, callers > should obviously handle the errno return.
They won't. If they do handle it, they will probably do some arbitrary invariant that still creates problems.
