On 2026/09/09 17:22, Klemens Nanni wrote: > 09.09.2026 13:59, Anthony J. Bentley пишет: > > There are probably still several ports with hidden deps on ccache. > > This should catch them. > > > > If upstream has a knob to turn off ccache, the port should use it. > > We could also add a few likely candidates to configure args by default, > say -DCCACHE=OFF, -CCACHE_Found=FALSE, etc. > > > If there isn't one, we can at least add an explicit build dependency. > > I'm not convinced we should help the port(er) use ccache(1) directly. > > Rather all usage should go through USE_CCACHE, which does warn if the > package is missing.
another approach might be to set CCACHE_DIR etc always, and just have it so that USE_CCACHE controls whether the compiler links are placed...
