On 20/10/26 18:04 +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2026/10/19 20:41, Robert Nagy wrote: > > On 19/10/26 19:17 +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > > On 2026/10/19 19:26, Robert Nagy wrote: > > > > why not just drop the headerextract thing and just depend on :patch > > > > without > > > > the flavor. wine is for amd64 only anyway so the machines should be > > > > fast. > > > > > > full extract is 2m12 vs 15s for just headers for me. seems a bit of > > > a pain if you're doing rebuilds to work on the port... > > > > i think you forgot what ports i am working on ;-P > > i know what ports you're working on, most people don't though ;) > > what was committed, i'm really not happy with. > > we could add the extra distfile directly to wine rather than via a > flavour in llvm (and use EXTRACT_CASES), but i don't really want people > to have to remember to update the version number after updating llvm, > and I don't see a good way to pull it in otherwise. (you can't even > do a horrible != construct because we don't know MODCLANG_VERSION > until bsd.port.mk has been pulled in, but if you do it afterwards it > breaks other things). > > anyway this is the minimum for me, but I'd really prefer to avoid > avoiding extracting 184k totally useless files.
i am fine with that flavor if you think it will make life easier.
