On Mon Oct 26, 2026 at 01:56:29PM +0100, Martijn van Duren wrote: > On 10/26/26 13:52, Kirill A. Korinsky wrote: > > On Mon, 26 Oct 2026 13:49:28 +0100, > > Martijn van Duren <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> Diff below contains 3 things and is widely discussed with kirill@, and > >> gone through miod, but sending it here so other people get a chance to > >> chime in. > >> 1) The report keyword results in an #error with newer gcc build system. > >> Simply removing the keyword suggested by kirill@. > >> 2) LINK_SPEC is already defined in gcc itself and causes a lot of > >> redefine noise. Going for the gcc definition as suggested by kirill@. > >> 3) upstream gcc has the same stack protector logic as was recently > >> fixed in base by miod@. This fixes similar build issues found with > >> gcc-16. Confirmed by miod@. > >> > >> OK? > >> > > > > I think you need revision bump in Makefile. > > > > Otherwise OK kirill@ > > All 3 patches are in alpha-specific code, which currently doesn't build, > so I don't think the revision bump is _needed_, especially considering > it will trigger quite a hefty rebuild for slower architectures, but I > can bump it if desired.> > >> martijn@
Agree, changes only in alpha only files. I'm in the team: No bump
