Hello! A couple of months ago, you guys helped me to put cad/nextpnr into the ports.
nextpnr is a tool for people who are enthusiastic about FPGAs, and it uses different backend libraries for different brands of FPGAs. (I took the liberty of adding a full list to the end of this email.) At the moment, my port is configured to use only one of them as a backend library, so it only supports one brand of FPGA. Which is a okay, but I am now toying with the idea to expand it. UNFORTUNATELY, this means that I would have to create 7 new ports. But I am not 100% sure that they would have merits outside of being a build dependency. So my question to you is: - Should I do it? - Should I give them plain names such as cad/trellis and cad/icestorm? - Would it be justified to group them in a new subdirectory below cad? - Is there a way I have not thought about yet? Thomas Full list of backend projects: https://github.com/YosysHQ/icestorm https://github.com/YosysHQ/prjtrellis https://github.com/gatecat/prjoxide https://github.com/YosysHQ/apicula https://github.com/YosysHQ-GmbH/prjbeyond-db https://github.com/YosysHQ/prjpeppercorn (aka cad/prjpeppercorn) https://github.com/Ravenslofty/mistral https://github.com/F4PGA/prjxray
