Pierre-Emmanuel Andre wrote:
Le Fri, 4 Jan 2008 17:45:19 -0800, Bryan Linton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :One question, since this version of Pan is a complete rewrite with a new user-configuration directory (".pan2" instead of ".pan"). Would it be better to make this an entirely new port instead of an update to the previous one?Why not... So i'am asking ports@ : new name (for example pan2 ? ) or just update ?
just update. keepin the old version around makes not much sense in this case (different story for e.g. python, which is a language, but this is application software).
