On Tue, 22 Apr 2008, Brad wrote: > On Tuesday 22 April 2008 01:58:06 Antoine Jacoutot wrote: > > On Mon, 21 Apr 2008, Brad wrote: > > > On Wed 2008.04.16 at 17:10 +0200, syl wrote: > > > > I've update the nasm package to version 2.02. > > > > > > Add amd64 to ONLY_FOR_ARCHS and make sure it works. > > > > And if it does, wouldn't it might be needed to add nasm as build_depends > > for ports that already do this for i386 in case it gets picked up by > > configure or so. > > No I would not just blindly add amd64 in. You would have to check each [...]
This is exactly what I said... "might", no "must". Whatever you think, each port using nasm needs review to be sure it does not get picked up implicitely under amd64. -- Antoine
