On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 7:43 PM, Martin Schröder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 2008/4/26 Marco Peereboom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > Huh? The wishes are gpl; the patch is available so all gpl requirements > > have been met. Why in the world is this being debated? > > > > If your logic was true all linux distributions would be breaking the > > rules because everyone patches stuff. How did you even come up with > > this? > > Have you read section 2 of the GPL lately? > > I agree that for "normal" patches (security fixes etc.) this is not an > issue - but only because nobody cares. These patches still create > modified versions, but it's a gray area. > > I argue that the anti-DRM patch is not a "normal" patch as stated > above but goes further and as such creates a modified version were you > must follow secion 2. > > It boils down to: When is a modification large enough so that section > 2 applies? >
It boils down to: When will Martin stop writing such crap showing his disrespect for his mail app's authors? iru
