* Brad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-05-13 10:24]: > On Tuesday 13 May 2008 04:13:48 Stuart Henderson wrote: > > On 2008/05/13 03:45, Brad wrote: > > > On Tuesday 13 May 2008 03:36:35 Dongsheng Song wrote: > > > > Thanks, needless changes removed. > > > > What did the MAINTAINER say when you contacted him? > > > > > Starting to look better. > > > > > > Don't remove the bdb FLAVOR. > > > > ldbm backend has been dropped in 2.4, they tell everyone to use > > bdb or hdb (hierarchical bdb) now. > > Wow. That is sad.
and makes a regular update a no-no in my eyes. I have been using ldbm everywhere all the time, because that was the only stable backend for years. I suspect I amnot quite alone (read:many many many more affected users). just updating this packe removing ldbm fucks them all. -- Henning Brauer, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] BS Web Services, http://bsws.de Full-Service ISP - Secure Hosting, Mail and DNS Services Dedicated Servers, Rootservers, Application Hosting - Hamburg & Amsterdam
