On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 9:45 AM, frantisek holop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > hmm, on Wed, May 21, 2008 at 06:26:44PM +0100, Edd Barrett said that >> texmf-full adds to texmf-minimul! There is no overlap! > > ok, now it makes sense... > but in that case why is there not a run_depend in full > for minimal?
Because base requires minimal and full requires base. Do you want to be a tl2008 tester? -- Best Regards Edd http://students.dec.bournemouth.ac.uk/ebarrett
