Question about ports tree not about packages. Interesting such as: cd /usr/ports/esound && make updatedepends(or make update=depends)
make repackage and pkg_add -ui works fine, but imho it's not ports system methods :) Nikolay Sturm-2 wrote: > > * Alexander.Pavlyutin [2008-06-03]: >> For example: >> I install esound(@option manual-installation in +CONTENTS) whitch >> autoinstall libaudiofile (no @option manual-installation in +CONTENTS). >> If I update libaudiofile from ports with "make update" I get @option >> manual-installation in +CONTENTS >> How I can update libaudiofile without getting @option manual-installation >> in >> +CONTENTS? > > The ports tree is not intended for use by endusers, they are supposed to > use pkg_add (there are exceptions, I know). So, just run pkg_add -ui and > you shouldn't get that 'manual-installation'. If you do, it is either a > bug in the pkg tools or the related feature is not finished yet. > > cheers, > > Nikolay > > -- > "It's all part of my Can't-Do approach to life." Wally > > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Question-about-%22make-update%22-tp17633464p17639774.html Sent from the openbsd user - ports mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
