On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 08:29:58PM +0200, Markus Lude wrote: > On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 08:11:44PM -0401, jared r r spiegel wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 08:02:59PM -0400, Brad wrote: > > > On Wednesday 16 July 2008 19:50:05 jared r r spiegel wrote: > > > > the pkg/PLIST in here has a .orig file it slurps up in 'make > > > > update-plist', it's not a critical update, but corrects a local-specific > > > > path in one of the default macro files. don't know what the preferred > > > > way > > > > of handling this is (just leave it, make a list of files to copy by > > > > hand in > > > > the Makefile, make a command in the Makefile to remove that .orig file > > > > before do-install, etc). > > > > > > Just use @comment to exclude the file. > > > > yeah, whoops; sthen@ reminded me minutes after i sent it. > > > > i had forgotten the nice part of pkg_create(1) that says: "hey > > jackass, this is the right way to do that" > > > > attached (b/c they're so small) is updated tgz who inc'ls that @comment. > > Please try the attached diff against -current. It should fix some minor > problems like: > > * use in-tree pcre > * keep .tf files in $PREFIX/share/tinyfuge. You moved them to > $PREFIX/share/tinyfuge/lib > * add all .tf files, some links were missing > > One thing where I'm a bit unsure: I added a cast in src/socket.c to > silence the warning: > > socket.c: In function `handle_socket_lines': > socket.c:2603: warning: assignment from incompatible pointer type > > Both LHS and RHS are pointers to a struct. The difference between both > is in one 2 members are const while not in the other struct. Is it > better to keep the warning or to add the cast as in > patches/patch-src_socket_c? > > Builds fine here on sparc64. Only lightly tested so far. I'll do some > more testing during next days.
There are some minor problems. I'll post an update after the tree unlocks. Regards, Markus
