Simon Kuhnle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Oh, nice, thank you :-)
No problem. Sometimes, you should just ask upstream instead of adding more patches, especially if it's an alpha. :) > The only other patch patches the gajim starter shellscript to use > /bin/sh and not /bin/bash, so I don't need bash as a dependency. > > -#!/bin/bash > +#!/bin/sh Ugh, that's an evil one, indeed. I just always python gajim.py (well, I don't, but my startscript does, thus I never noticed. > -exec -a gajim ${PYTHON_EXEC} -OO gajim.py $@ > +exec ${PYTHON_EXEC} -OO gajim.py $@ That -a is used so the process is displayed as being Gajim. Do you know of a portable way for that? Otherwise I'd need to somehow check if it's bash and only then do that. > as the shell doesn't have the -a flag. Yes, it's a bash extension. > No big deal, as -a only changes the name of the process AFAIK. Exactly. That makes it possible to use pkill gajim :). -- Jonathan
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature