Simon Kuhnle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Oh, nice, thank you :-)
No problem. Sometimes, you should just ask upstream instead of adding
more patches, especially if it's an alpha. :)
> The only other patch patches the gajim starter shellscript to use
> /bin/sh and not /bin/bash, so I don't need bash as a dependency.
>
> -#!/bin/bash
> +#!/bin/sh
Ugh, that's an evil one, indeed. I just always python gajim.py
(well, I don't, but my startscript does, thus I never noticed.
> -exec -a gajim ${PYTHON_EXEC} -OO gajim.py $@
> +exec ${PYTHON_EXEC} -OO gajim.py $@
That -a is used so the process is displayed as being Gajim. Do you know of a
portable way for that? Otherwise I'd need to somehow check if it's bash
and only then do that.
> as the shell doesn't have the -a flag.
Yes, it's a bash extension.
> No big deal, as -a only changes the name of the process AFAIK.
Exactly. That makes it possible to use pkill gajim :).
--
Jonathan
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
