On Thu, 13 Nov 2008, J.C. Roberts wrote: > On Thu, 13 Nov 2008 19:01:02 +0100 (CET) > Antoine Jacoutot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > What about this instead. > > I added a patch from sylpheed svn via Fedora to make use of > > gtkspell/enchant. > > > > It seems to work fine here. > > I like your patch *much* better because it's the "right" way to deal > with the problem, but my main concern was if such changes would ever > make it upstream, or will we be stuck maintaining them?
The patch is from svn afaik so it is already upstream. > The whole dual tree nonsense, sylpheed versus sylpheed-claws > (claws-mail), with the latter being for new features/experiments, seems > to exist to take pressure off of the developer(s) of slypheed proper. > > I'll try to test your patch tonight on i386. :-) Ok, let me know. Cheers! -- Antoine
