On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 at 07:53:05PM +0100, Marc Espie wrote: > On Mon, Jan 05, 2009 at 06:36:55AM +0000, Jacob Meuser wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 05, 2009 at 12:08:08AM -0600, Stanley Lieber wrote: > > > The port I found below compiles cleanly but will not build the package > > > on my i386/4.4 system. Flash Player 9 (suggested by the creator of the > > > port) installs but will not render YouTube clips in my browser. The > > > Flash Player 7 installed by the Opera Flash plugin port does work with > > > YouTube. > > > > if all you want is to play youtube videos, gnash actually works a > > lot better in -current using the sndio gstreamer backend than it > > did with the gstreamer OSS backend. > > On the other hand, there are a lots of fuck-ups yet in gnash. It's not > only the audio backend, buttons tend not to work, for instance.
well, I've tried updating gstreamer and then gnash, but flex in base needs to be updated first. > So, even if we don't really like linux emulation, nor proprietary flash, > there's no reason to ditch the effort of people who want to make it work. ? I offered an easier solution to play youtube videos. and I even specifically said "if all you want is to play youtube videos". I asked if nspluginwrapper works on amd64. who's ditching (I think you wanted 'dissing') anything? -- [email protected] SDF Public Access UNIX System - http://sdf.lonestar.org
