On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 01:18:24PM +0100, d-ra wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 12:12:20PM +0100, Jasper Lievisse Adriaanse wrote: > > here's an update for fetchmail. > > any users of fetchmail who could take it for a spin? > > patch-pop3_c was added for some good reason. It makes fetchmail to > operate together with stunnel or socat. it was committed upstream. so no need to keep the patch around ;-)
> > RCS file: patches/patch-pop3_c > > diff -N patches/patch-pop3_c > > --- patches/patch-pop3_c 2 Feb 2009 11:42:13 -0000 1.1 > > +++ /dev/null 1 Jan 1970 00:00:00 -0000 > > @@ -1,16 +0,0 @@ > > -$OpenBSD: patch-pop3_c,v 1.1 2009/02/02 11:42:13 bernd Exp $ > > - > > -Fix stunnel usage with TLS1 encryption. > > -https://lists.berlios.de/pipermail/fetchmail-users/2007-December/001396.html > > - > > ---- pop3.c.orig Sun Mar 18 02:13:45 2007 > > -+++ pop3.c Mon Feb 2 12:37:35 2009 > > -@@ -449,7 +449,7 @@ static int pop3_getauth(int sock, struct query *ctl, c > > - report(stderr, GT_("TLS is mandatory for this session, > > but server refused CAPA command.\n")); > > - report(stderr, GT_("The CAPA command is however > > necessary for TLS.\n")); > > - return ok; > > -- } else { > > -+ } else if (maybe_tls(ctl)) { > > - /* defeat opportunistic STLS */ > > - xfree(ctl->sslproto); > > - ctl->sslproto = xstrdup(""); > -- "Intelligence should guide our actions, but in harmony with the texture of the situation at hand" -- Francisco Varela
