On Sun, Mar 08, 2009 at 11:42:12PM +0100, Jasper Lievisse Adriaanse wrote: > On Sun, Mar 08, 2009 at 05:32:12PM -0400, STeve Andre' wrote: > > On Sunday 08 March 2009 14:21:33 Jasper Lievisse Adriaanse wrote: > > > hi, > > > > > > are there any users left of graphics/gtksee? or anyone else who'll shed > > > a tear to see this removed? it's an old image viewer based on gtk+1. > > > there are plenty newer (gtk+2-based) image viewers around which can > > > serve as an alternative. > > > > > > so, any objections to removing gtksee? > > > > > > cheers, > > > jasper > > > > A soft whimper from here. It works and doesn't seem to blow up with > > lots of files. I guess I need to switch. > > > > So what viewers can deal with 50K+ files without dying? Lately I've > > been helping someone with a picture database of little teeny tiny > > parts, all in seperate jpegs (yes, insane, I know). Gtksee was the > > best tool to browse through them I'd found. > > > > --STeve Andre' > > could you have a go with display (from imagemagick), eog, gthumb or the > like? there's no need to switch unless you've found a worthy > alternative and no-one else speaks up :)
Try gqview, too. Stefan
