> The $PACKAGE_REPOSITORY directory, typically /usr/ports/packages/, will
> normally contain subdirectories for arch, as well as, further
> subdirectories for desired\allowed redistribution (cdrom, ftp, ...).

No, we don't do that.

>       /usr/ports/packages/i386/
>       /usr/ports/packages/i386/all
>       /usr/ports/packages/i386/ftp
>       /usr/ports/packages/i386/cdrom
> 
> The /usr/ports/packages/no-arch/ directory does not contain further
> subdirectories for desired\allowed redistribution?
> 
> If something with problematic redistribution like Java 1.5 was broken
> into multi-packages (main, docs, ...), and the docs were properly put
> in the no-arch directory, then we now have a redistribution problem.
> 
> Is the no-arch redistribution subdirs a problem worth fixing?

Nope.

Reply via email to