On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 02:59:23PM +0100, Mikolaj Kucharski wrote: > On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 10:34:12AM +0100, vex...@gmail.com wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 10:14:33AM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > > I don't think anybody is going to sweep the whole tree for this, there > > > are more important things to sweep the tree for... > > > > Perhaps as people update ports, first send the diff to update the > > functionaility, then when thats in a style diff. > > I would prefer opposite. First send style changes, as that should not > break anything, then after a while, patch for update. > > or > > Send patch with update, wait a week or two, and then send style changes.
<sarcastic> Yeah sure, we have enough time/manpower to deal with both... </sarcastic> I generally use new style in new ports i'm working on, but don't bother on port updates. It really makes diffs unreadable, and as stuart said there are far more important things to deal with when updating ports. Imo, the only option would be to script that conversion, and eventually commit all style fixes at once, but i don't know if someone would work on that, and i doubt someone would triplecheck the result.. Landry
