Daniel,
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 05:24:28AM -0400, Daniel Dickman wrote:
>[...]
> Any comments? Thoughts?
Nice work.
It's pedantic, but... regarding port2.html#PortSecurity, second point:
IMHO, strcmp is qualitatively different from strcat/strcpy/sprintf
with respect to buffer overflows - one might just as well say "strlen"
or any function which takes pointer(s).
Yes, I did report this for the original porting.html. No, my suggestion
wasn't accepted. Please feel free to do likewise :-)
Cheers,
rlr
--
Ross L Richardson <URL:mailto:[email protected]>
Senior Systems Administrator Phone : +61 (0)3 6226 6233
Information Technology Resources Fax : +61 (0)3 6226 7171
University of Tasmania, AUSTRALIA
