On 2009/07/10 12:34, Henning Brauer wrote: > * Stuart Henderson <[email protected]> [2009-07-10 02:12]: > > On 2009/07/09 22:16, Henning Brauer wrote: > > > * Stuart Henderson <[email protected]> [2009-07-09 21:14]: > > > > Me too, but if something pulls in 2.3 as a BUILD or LIB depend, and > > > > something else pulls in 2.4 > > > > > > is this really going to happen? > > > > i don't know. > > > > i can definitely foresee a time where things will start needing > > 2.4 client libs. > > can't these depend on openldap-2.4 and everything else on openldap-* > then?
the packages would have to be built against the right libraries... hmmm... just noticed that libldap-2.3.so.* is installed and also a symlink libldap-so.*. I wonder how much would break if we remove the symlink. that's another thing to try when I can get a bulk build machine together then.
