Henning Brauer wrote: > * Jason Dixon <[email protected]> [2009-07-21 23:06]: ... [postgresql needs a dump and reload as part of upgrade] ... >> Reasonable solution (examples): >> >> http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-ports-cvs&m=120637961514930&w=2 >> http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc&m=120631560919405&w=2 >> http://undeadly.org/cgi?action=article&sid=20080324162049 >> >> Expect an Undeadly story soonish. > > the upgrade47.html entry is the most important really.
I'm inclined to agree. I may be biased, but really...a mail list or chat board posting over 10 months before the 4.7 release day? I don't think that even resembles useful. If upgradeXX.html is not the first place people look for upgrade information either... 1) you are missing something. 2) I'm wasting a hell of a lot of time. If it is case 2, please let me know... There are a lot of much more fun and less stressful things I could be doing than building out upgradeXX.* if no one bothers to look at it or if people think it isn't useful. After all, the time I put it together is usually some of the best motorcycle and convertible riding weather of the year. :) The feedback I get on upgradeXX.html is usually very positive, but every once in a while I see something from people who I think should know better who directly or indirectly tell me they have never looked at it or used it. If there's a better source, tell me. Heck..tell EVERYONE. I've just committed skeletons of upgrade46.html AND upgrade47.html, there's a spot in there for ports that need special attention. I ask for suggestions for every release, and every release I get one or two suggestions (usually AFTER I give up and delete that section from the document! :) If there's something that needs to be in there, put it in. I put the postgresql note in upgrade47.html already. Consider this the first request for stuff for 4.6, too. :) Nick.
