On Mon, 30 Nov 2009, Philip Guenther wrote: > I get your point that altering the base to make a port happier when it's > not a good idea in its own right seems wrong. Thus my labeling it a > workaround and not a fix. > > IMO, the Right Thing is to have the port excise a chunk of the logic in > procmail's screenmailbox() function. Simply changing GROUPW_UMASK seems > wrong, as procmail will continue to give the new mailbox the group of the > directory instead of behaving like mail.local by giving it the user's > default group.
Sure, that is why I asked if anyone knew the reason ;-) I didn't pretend procmail was doing something wrong, I was just curious about the behave in a different way that mail.local. I'll look at screenmailbox(). Thanks. -- Antoine
