On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 01:43:57AM +0100, Edd Barrett wrote:
> > stuff shouldn't cause harm to texlive. No idea wether this as bad
> > effects on latex2html itself, but this whole latex2html thing already
> > looks semi-broken to me.
>
> It has never been that great. How do you mean "semi-broken"?
By semi-broken I mean:
- still some useage of $*, which has been removed since perl 5.10
- inclusion of several TeX stuff that would better be pulled in from
texlive's directories (like that url.sty)
- mostly unmaintained, except for the license clarification in 2008
> I tested a *really* simple document and it appeared to work.
Same here for the darcs documentation.
> Also the regression test outputs look OK to me.
So if nobody complains, I'll commit this tomorrow.
Ciao,
Kili
