On Wed, Jun 09, 2010 at 10:07:06PM +0200, David Coppa wrote: > On Wed, 09 Jun 2010, Jacob Meuser wrote: > > > please update the license marker as well if you're going to do this. > > Updated diff following. I don't understand why ffmpeg needs gplv3 > since opencore-amr has an Apache 2.0 license..
probably that whole anti-patent thing. ffmpeg has had amr support for years, btw. it was never enabled in the port because the source of the source files, and thus the actual distribution terms, was not 100% known (as in, good chance it was copied from completely non-free code). I wonder if opencore-amr really changes the situation, or if they are just trying to use a license that adds more confusion to the situation/makes people think they're "protected". -- [email protected] SDF Public Access UNIX System - http://sdf.lonestar.org
