> On Thu, Oct 07, 2010 at 12:36:32PM -0400, Alex Libman wrote:
> > 
> > Perhaps down the road it might make sense to use additional "flavors" to
> > simplify disabling those? I think a lot of OpenBSD users, particularly
> > those who choose Fossil, might be trying to reduce their dependencies on
> > GNU components (i.e. gnupg), or avoid installing a zillion different
> > scripting languages (i.e. tcl).

This type of flavour exists in some ports but rarely gets tested
properly on an ongoing basis, so we generally do not do this.
Especially where it only reduces build dependencies rather than
runtime ones (if you wish to avoid having a bunch of build
dependencies installed, just use the packages already produced,
they're the same as the packages produced/installed when you
build/install from ports).

On 2010/10/07 12:51, James Turner wrote:
> You are correct, gnupg is not required, if it's installed however you
> can use it to sign your commits.

This could be changed to a note in pkg/DESCR rather than an actual
dependency but in the case of gnupg, it doesn't pull in all that many
other packages so I don't think there's much point.

Reply via email to