On Saturday 09 October 2010 16:33:38 Matthias Kilian wrote: > Is there any reason why this shouldn't use freeglut (instead of > glut)?
Hmm. Is there a consensus to always use either of the two? Freeglut does seem like the better solution to me, but since glut and freeglut conflict, I think we should move all ports to using freeglut and then remove glut entirely.
