Hi, From: Anibal Limón <[email protected]> Date: 2010/11/2 Subject: Re: New port libmodbus-2.0.3 To: Markus Bergkvist <[email protected]>
Hi, I update the port because the developer upload the original sources to libmodbus.org. I test again the port and looks ok with the changes of makefile. Cheers. 2010/11/2 Anibal Limón <[email protected]> Hi, > > The port that was sent is functional, but the sources used in the port are > from a previous version, libmodbus.org sources differ from launchpad.netbut > the two sources are version 2.0.3. > > I use launchpad.net sources, the main difference with libmodbus.orgsources > lies in the use of auto{conf, make, etc.}. > > The patch is very basic only include some headers and delete IPTOS_LOWDELAY > socket option. > > Thanks. > > 2010/11/2 Markus Bergkvist <[email protected]> > > Hi Anibal >> >> What's the progress with this port? >> >> /Markus >> >> >> On 10/20/10 23:24, Markus Bergkvist wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On 10/20/10 17:34, Anibal Limón wrote: >>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> I have done a port of libmodbus-2.0.3, this library implements ModBUS >>>> RTU/TCP protocol that is used in industrial networks to communicate a >>>> variety hardware. >>>> >>>> I only test in i386 platform. >>>> >>>> Comments are wellcome. >>>> >>>> Thanks. >>>> >>> >>> Not tested yet but I might find this port useful. Some comments though. >>> >>> On https://launchpad.net/libmodbus/ >>> "The new project website project is http://www.libmodbus.org. >>> The launchpad page is now OBSOLETE." >>> >>> Mastersite also changed. >>> >>> SHARED_LIBS, I believe you should start with 0.0 >>> >>> Use a more recent Makefile template? >>> >>> "COMMENT is a SHORT one-line description of the port" >>> http://www.openbsd.org/faq/ports/guide.html >>> >>> /Markus >>> >>> >>> >
libmodbus.tgz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data
