Wipe out /usr/ports, you have old files present. I would not recommend ports.tar.gz, cvs is easier to work with
On 2010/11/24 02:54, Max Stalnaker wrote: > attached is a script > shows some problems > I think the "file name to patch" question I referenced will show up nicely > > but here is perhaps the key element, given that you asked about cvs. So I > went > to snapshot (11/22/10) from the mirror and in that part of the tree I got my > ports.tar.gz at the same time. I would like to think that would be just > fine, > but maybe I am yet again dumb. In any case, I was at release, clean install, > and then this week I went to snapshot, and have not done any cvs stuff. > (Upgrade to snapshot via install48.iso in snapshots i386) > > And one of the reasons for going to snapshot was there were a number of ports > asking for the patch file. So it is troubling. > > > ________________________________ > From: Landry Breuil <lan...@rhaalovely.net> > To: ports@openbsd.org > Sent: Wed, November 24, 2010 12:26:19 AM > Subject: Re: boost > > On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 04:12:30PM -0800, Max Stalnaker wrote: > > This has that file name to patch: question showing up. I attached a log, > > but > >it > > > > all it really might say is where it stops. > > > > pkg_add -u worked ok. > > Sorry, your mail makes no sense, neither does the log. make patch in > devel/boost works fine here, so make sure your cvs tree is clean. > You can also do 'PATCH_DEBUG=yes make patch' to have more info on what > happens. > > Landry > > > > > Script started on Wed Nov 24 02:37:09 2010 > $ pwd > /usr/ports/devel/boost > $ suid do mke k ake repackage > Password: > ===> Cleaning for boost-1.42.0p5 > rm -f /usr/ports/packages/i386/all/boost-1.42.0p5.tgz > /usr/ports/packages/i386/ftp/boost-1.42.0p5.tgz > /usr/ports/packages/i386/cdrom/boost-1.42.0p5.tgz > ===> Patching for boost-1.42.0p5 > File to patch: > No file found--skip this patch? [n] y > 3 out of 3 hunks ignored--saving rejects to Oops.rej > ***> patch-Jamfile_v2 did not apply cleanly > No such line 92 in input file, ignoring > 1 out of 1 hunks failed--saving rejects to boost/detail/atomic_count.hpp.rej > ***> patch-boost_detail_atomic_count_hpp did not apply cleanly > 10 out of 13 hunks failed--saving rejects to > boost/function/function_base.hpp.rej > ***> patch-boost_function_function_base_hpp did not apply cleanly > Ignoring previously applied (or reversed) patch. > 3 out of 3 hunks ignored--saving rejects to > boost/regex/v4/basic_regex_parser.hpp.rej > ***> patch-boost_regex_v4_basic_regex_parser_hpp did not apply cleanly > File to patch: > No file found--skip this patch? [n] y > 2 out of 2 hunks ignored--saving rejects to Oops.rej > ***> patch-configure did not apply cleanly > Ignoring previously applied (or reversed) patch. > 1 out of 1 hunks ignored--saving rejects to > libs/regex/test/regress/test_perl_ex.cpp.rej > ***> patch-libs_regex_test_regress_test_perl_ex_cpp did not apply cleanly > Ignoring previously applied (or reversed) patch. > 1 out of 1 hunks ignored--saving rejects to > libs/serialization/build/Jamfile.v2.rej > ***> patch-libs_serialization_build_Jamfile_v2 did not apply cleanly > 2 out of 2 hunks failed--saving rejects to > libs/serialization/test/Jamfile.v2.rej > ***> patch-libs_serialization_test_Jamfile_v2 did not apply cleanly > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/ports/devel/boost (line 2347 of > /usr/ports/infrastructure/mk/bsd.port.mk). > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/ports/devel/boost (line 1681 of > /usr/ports/infrastructure/mk/bsd.port.mk). > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/ports/devel/boost (line 2242 of > /usr/ports/infrastructure/mk/bsd.port.mk). > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/ports/devel/boost (line 2222 of > /usr/ports/infrastructure/mk/bsd.port.mk). > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/ports/devel/boost (line 3308 of > /usr/ports/infrastructure/mk/bsd.port.mk). > $ sudo make clean > ===> Cleaning for boost-1.42.0p5 > $ sudo make repak ckage > ===> Cleaning for boost-1.42.0p5 > rm -f /usr/ports/packages/i386/all/boost-1.42.0p5.tgz > /usr/ports/packages/i386/ftp/boost-1.42.0p5.tgz > /usr/ports/packages/i386/cdrom/boost-1.42.0p5.tgz > ===> Checking files for boost-1.42.0p5 > `/usr/ports/distfiles/boost_1_42_0.tar.gz' is up to date. > >> (SHA256) boost_1_42_0.tar.gz: OK > ===> boost-1.42.0p5 depends on: python->=2.6,<2.7 - found > ===> Verifying specs: c m pthread stdc++ util z c m pthread stdc++ util z > ===> found c.58.0 m.5.2 pthread.13.1 stdc++.50.0 util.11.2 z.4.1 > ===> Extracting for boost-1.42.0p5 > ===> Patching for boost-1.42.0p5 > File to patch: > No file found--skip this patch? [n] y > File to patch: > No file found--skip this patch? [n] > File to patch: > No file found--skip this patch? [n] > File to patch: > No file found--skip this patch? [n] > File to patch: > No file found--skip this patch? [n] > File to patch: > No file found--skip this patch? [n] > File to patch: > No file found--skip this patch? [n] > File to patch: > No file found--skip this patch? [n] > File to patch: > No file found--skip this patch? [n] > File to patch: > No file found--skip this patch? [n] > File to patch: > No file found--skip this patch? [n] > File to patch: > No file found--skip this patch? [n] > File to patch: > No file found--skip this patch? [n] > File to patch: > No file found--skip this patch? [n] > File to patch: > No file found--skip this patch? [n] > File to patch: > No file found--skip this patch? [n] y > 3 out of 3 hunks ignored--saving rejects to Oops.rej > ***> patch-Jamfile_v2 did not apply cleanly > No such line 92 in input file, ignoring > 1 out of 1 hunks failed--saving rejects to boost/detail/atomic_count.hpp.rej > ***> patch-boost_detail_atomic_count_hpp did not apply cleanly > 10 out of 13 hunks failed--saving rejects to > boost/function/function_base.hpp.rej > ***> patch-boost_function_function_base_hpp did not apply cleanly > Ignoring previously applied (or reversed) patch. > 3 out of 3 hunks ignored--saving rejects to > boost/regex/v4/basic_regex_parser.hpp.rej > ***> patch-boost_regex_v4_basic_regex_parser_hpp did not apply cleanly > File to patch: > No file found--skip this patch? [n] y > 2 out of 2 hunks ignored--saving rejects to Oops.rej > ***> patch-configure did not apply cleanly > Ignoring previously applied (or reversed) patch. > 1 out of 1 hunks ignored--saving rejects to > libs/regex/test/regress/test_perl_ex.cpp.rej > ***> patch-libs_regex_test_regress_test_perl_ex_cpp did not apply cleanly > Ignoring previously applied (or reversed) patch. > 1 out of 1 hunks ignored--saving rejects to > libs/serialization/build/Jamfile.v2.rej > ***> patch-libs_serialization_build_Jamfile_v2 did not apply cleanly > 2 out of 2 hunks failed--saving rejects to > libs/serialization/test/Jamfile.v2.rej > ***> patch-libs_serialization_test_Jamfile_v2 did not apply cleanly > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/ports/devel/boost (line 2347 of > /usr/ports/infrastructure/mk/bsd.port.mk). > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/ports/devel/boost (line 1681 of > /usr/ports/infrastructure/mk/bsd.port.mk). > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/ports/devel/boost (line 2242 of > /usr/ports/infrastructure/mk/bsd.port.mk). > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/ports/devel/boost (line 2222 of > /usr/ports/infrastructure/mk/bsd.port.mk). > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/ports/devel/boost (line 3308 of > /usr/ports/infrastructure/mk/bsd.port.mk). > $ sudo PATCH_DEBUG=yes TC_DEBUG=yes > make poatc atch > ===> Patching for boost-1.42.0p5 > File to patch: > No file found--skip this patch? [n] > File to patch: > No file found--skip this patch? [n] > File to patch: > No file found--skip this patch? [n] > File to patch: > No file found--skip this patch? [n] > File to patch: y > No file found--skip this patch? [n] y > 3 out of 3 hunks ignored--saving rejects to y.rej > ***> patch-Jamfile_v2 did not apply cleanly > Ignoring previously applied (or reversed) patch. > 3 out of 3 hunks ignored--saving rejects to Jamroot.rej > ***> patch-Jamroot did not apply cleanly > Ignoring previously applied (or reversed) patch. > 1 out of 1 hunks ignored--saving rejects to > boost/archive/impl/basic_text_iprimitive.ipp.rej > ***> patch-boost_archive_impl_basic_text_iprimitive_ipp did not apply > cleanly > Ignoring previously applied (or reversed) patch. > 3 out of 3 hunks ignored--saving rejects to > boost/archive/iterators/remove_whitespace.hpp.rej > ***> patch-boost_archive_iterators_remove_whitespace_hpp did not apply > cleanly > Ignoring previously applied (or reversed) patch. > 1 out of 1 hunks ignored--saving rejects to > boost/asio/detail/pipe_select_interrupter.hpp.rej > ***> patch-boost_asio_detail_pipe_select_interrupter_hpp did not apply > cleanly > Ignoring previously applied (or reversed) patch. > 1 out of 1 hunks ignored--saving rejects to > boost/asio/detail/socket_ops.hpp.rej > ***> patch-boost_asio_detail_socket_ops_hpp did not apply cleanly > Ignoring previously applied (or reversed) patch. > 2 out of 2 hunks ignored--saving rejects to > boost/config/stdlib/libstdcpp3.hpp.rej > ***> patch-boost_config_stdlib_libstdcpp3_hpp did not apply cleanly > Ignoring previously applied (or reversed) patch. > 1 out of 1 hunks ignored--saving rejects to boost/config/suffix.hpp.rej > ***> patch-boost_config_suffix_hpp did not apply cleanly > No such line 92 in input file, ignoring > 1 out of 1 hunks failed--saving rejects to boost/detail/atomic_count.hpp.rej > ***> patch-boost_detail_atomic_count_hpp did not apply cleanly > Ignoring previously applied (or reversed) patch. > 1 out of 1 hunks ignored--saving rejects to boost/detail/endian.hpp.rej > ***> patch-boost_detail_endian_hpp did not apply cleanly > 10 out of 13 hunks failed--saving rejects to > boost/function/function_base.hpp.rej > ***> patch-boost_function_function_base_hpp did not apply cleanly > Ignoring previously applied (or reversed) patch. > 1 out of 1 hunks ignored--saving rejects to > boost/function/function_template.hpp.rej > ***> patch-boost_function_function_template_hpp did not apply cleanly > Ignoring previously applied (or reversed) patch. > 1 out of 1 hunks ignored--saving rejects to > boost/math/special_functions/expm1.hpp.rej > ***> patch-boost_math_special_functions_expm1_hpp did not apply cleanly > Ignoring previously applied (or reversed) patch. > 2 out of 2 hunks ignored--saving rejects to > boost/math/special_functions/log1p.hpp.rej > ***> patch-boost_math_special_functions_log1p_hpp did not apply cleanly > Ignoring previously applied (or reversed) patch. > 1 out of 1 hunks ignored--saving rejects to boost/math/tools/config.hpp.rej > ***> patch-boost_math_tools_config_hpp did not apply cleanly > Ignoring previously applied (or reversed) patch. > 1 out of 1 hunks ignored--saving rejects to > boost/property_tree/detail/xml_parser_read_rapidxml.hpp.rej > ***> patch-boost_property_tree_detail_xml_parser_read_rapidxml_hpp did not > apply cleanly > Ignoring previously applied (or reversed) patch. > 1 out of 1 hunks ignored--saving rejects to boost/regex/config.hpp.rej > ***> patch-boost_regex_config_hpp did not apply cleanly > Ignoring previously applied (or reversed) patch. > 3 out of 3 hunks ignored--saving rejects to > boost/regex/v4/basic_regex_parser.hpp.rej > ***> patch-boost_regex_v4_basic_regex_parser_hpp did not apply cleanly > Ignoring previously applied (or reversed) patch. > 1 out of 1 hunks ignored--saving rejects to > boost/smart_ptr/detail/atomic_count.hpp.rej > ***> patch-boost_smart_ptr_detail_atomic_count_hpp did not apply cleanly > Ignoring previously applied (or reversed) patch. > 1 out of 1 hunks ignored--saving rejects to > boost/test/impl/execution_monitor.ipp.rej > ***> patch-boost_test_impl_execution_monitor_ipp did not apply cleanly > Ignoring previously applied (or reversed) patch. > 1 out of 1 hunks ignored--saving rejects to boost/throw_exception.hpp.rej > ***> patch-boost_throw_exception_hpp did not apply cleanly > Ignoring previously applied (or reversed) patch. > 1 out of 1 hunks ignored--saving rejects to boost/wave/token_ids.hpp.rej > ***> patch-boost_wave_token_ids_hpp did not apply cleanly > File to patch: y > No file found--skip this patch? [n] > patch: **** can't find y > ***> patch-configure did not apply cleanly > Ignoring previously applied (or reversed) patch. > 2 out of 2 hunks ignored--saving rejects to libs/config/configure.rej > ***> patch-libs_config_configure did not apply cleanly > Ignoring previously applied (or reversed) patch. > 1 out of 1 hunks ignored--saving rejects to > libs/config/test/boost_has_clock_gettime.ipp.rej > ***> patch-libs_config_test_boost_has_clock_gettime_ipp did not apply > cleanly > Ignoring previously applied (or reversed) patch. > 1 out of 1 hunks ignored--saving rejects to > libs/config/test/boost_has_pthread_yield.ipp.rej > ***> patch-libs_config_test_boost_has_pthread_yield_ipp did not apply > cleanly > Ignoring previously applied (or reversed) patch. > 1 out of 1 hunks ignored--saving rejects to > libs/detail/utf8_codecvt_facet.cpp.rej > ***> patch-libs_detail_utf8_codecvt_facet_cpp did not apply cleanly > Ignoring previously applied (or reversed) patch. > 2 out of 2 hunks ignored--saving rejects to libs/random/random_device.cpp.rej > ***> patch-libs_random_random_device_cpp did not apply cleanly > Ignoring previously applied (or reversed) patch. > 1 out of 1 hunks ignored--saving rejects to > libs/regex/src/regex_traits_defaults.cpp.rej > ***> patch-libs_regex_src_regex_traits_defaults_cpp did not apply cleanly > Ignoring previously applied (or reversed) patch. > 1 out of 1 hunks ignored--saving rejects to > libs/regex/src/wc_regex_traits.cpp.rej > ***> patch-libs_regex_src_wc_regex_traits_cpp did not apply cleanly > Ignoring previously applied (or reversed) patch. > 1 out of 1 hunks ignored--saving rejects to > libs/regex/test/regress/test_perl_ex.cpp.rej > ***> patch-libs_regex_test_regress_test_perl_ex_cpp did not apply cleanly > Ignoring previously applied (or reversed) patch. > 1 out of 1 hunks ignored--saving rejects to > libs/serialization/build/Jamfile.v2.rej > ***> patch-libs_serialization_build_Jamfile_v2 did not apply cleanly > Ignoring previously applied (or reversed) patch. > 1 out of 1 hunks ignored--saving rejects to > libs/serialization/src/stl_port.cpp.rej > ***> patch-libs_serialization_src_stl_port_cpp did not apply cleanly > 2 out of 2 hunks failed--saving rejects to > libs/serialization/test/Jamfile.v2.rej > ***> patch-libs_serialization_test_Jamfile_v2 did not apply cleanly > Ignoring previously applied (or reversed) patch. > 5 out of 5 hunks ignored--saving rejects to tools/build/v2/tools/gcc.jam.rej > ***> patch-tools_build_v2_tools_gcc_jam did not apply cleanly > Ignoring previously applied (or reversed) patch. > 1 out of 1 hunks ignored--saving rejects to > tools/build/v2/tools/python.jam.rej > ***> patch-tools_build_v2_tools_python_jam did not apply cleanly > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/ports/devel/boost (line 2347 of > /usr/ports/infrastructure/mk/bsd.port.mk). > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/ports/devel/boost (line 2222 of > /usr/ports/infrastructure/mk/bsd.port.mk). > $ sud9 o make clean > ===> Cleaning for boost-1.42.0p5 > $ $ sudo make clean $ sudo PATC_DEBUG=yes make patch > ===> boost-1.42.0p5 depends on: python->=2.6,<2.7 - found > ===> Verifying specs: c m pthread stdc++ util z c m pthread stdc++ util z > ===> found c.58.0 m.5.2 pthread.13.1 stdc++.50.0 util.11.2 z.4.1 > ===> Checking files for boost-1.42.0p5 > `/usr/ports/distfiles/boost_1_42_0.tar.gz' is up to date. > >> (SHA256) boost_1_42_0.tar.gz: OK > ===> Extracting for boost-1.42.0p5 > ===> Patching for boost-1.42.0p5 > File to patch: > No file found--skip this patch? [n] y > 3 out of 3 hunks ignored--saving rejects to Oops.rej > ***> patch-Jamfile_v2 did not apply cleanly > No such line 92 in input file, ignoring > 1 out of 1 hunks failed--saving rejects to boost/detail/atomic_count.hpp.rej > ***> patch-boost_detail_atomic_count_hpp did not apply cleanly > 10 out of 13 hunks failed--saving rejects to > boost/function/function_base.hpp.rej > ***> patch-boost_function_function_base_hpp did not apply cleanly > Ignoring previously applied (or reversed) patch. > 3 out of 3 hunks ignored--saving rejects to > boost/regex/v4/basic_regex_parser.hpp.rej > ***> patch-boost_regex_v4_basic_regex_parser_hpp did not apply cleanly > File to patch: y > No file found--skip this patch? [n] y > 2 out of 2 hunks ignored--saving rejects to y.rej > ***> patch-configure did not apply cleanly > Ignoring previously applied (or reversed) patch. > 1 out of 1 hunks ignored--saving rejects to > libs/regex/test/regress/test_perl_ex.cpp.rej > ***> patch-libs_regex_test_regress_test_perl_ex_cpp did not apply cleanly > Ignoring previously applied (or reversed) patch. > 1 out of 1 hunks ignored--saving rejects to > libs/serialization/build/Jamfile.v2.rej > ***> patch-libs_serialization_build_Jamfile_v2 did not apply cleanly > 2 out of 2 hunks failed--saving rejects to > libs/serialization/test/Jamfile.v2.rej > ***> patch-libs_serialization_test_Jamfile_v2 did not apply cleanly > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/ports/devel/boost (line 2347 of > /usr/ports/infrastructure/mk/bsd.port.mk). > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/ports/devel/boost (line 2222 of > /usr/ports/infrastructure/mk/bsd.port.mk). > $ sudo make clean > ===> Cleaning for boost-1.42.0p5 > $ $ sudo make clean $ sudo PATC_DEBUG=yes make patch H_DEBUG=yes make patch > ===> boost-1.42.0p5 depends on: python->=2.6,<2.7 - found > ===> Verifying specs: c m pthread stdc++ util z c m pthread stdc++ util z > ===> found c.58.0 m.5.2 pthread.13.1 stdc++.50.0 util.11.2 z.4.1 > ===> Checking files for boost-1.42.0p5 > `/usr/ports/distfiles/boost_1_42_0.tar.gz' is up to date. > >> (SHA256) boost_1_42_0.tar.gz: OK > ===> Extracting for boost-1.42.0p5 > ===> Patching for boost-1.42.0p5 > ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-Jamfile_v2 > Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... > The text leading up to this was: > -------------------------- > |$OpenBSD: patch-Jamfile_v2,v 1.1 2008/04/03 07:44:39 bernd Exp $ > |--- Jamfile.v2.orig Tue May 29 19:46:37 2007 > |+++ Jamfile.v2 Wed Jan 9 21:57:39 2008 > -------------------------- > File to patch: > No file found--skip this patch? [n] y > Skipping patch... > Hunk #1 ignored at 110. > Hunk #2 ignored at 175. > Hunk #3 ignored at 232. > 3 out of 3 hunks ignored--saving rejects to Oops.rej > done > ***> patch-Jamfile_v2 did not apply cleanly > ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-Jamroot > Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... > The text leading up to this was: > -------------------------- > |$OpenBSD: patch-Jamroot,v 1.2 2010/04/21 09:26:58 landry Exp $ > |--- Jamroot.orig Sun Jan 24 21:43:34 2010 > |+++ Jamroot Wed Apr 21 09:38:38 2010 > -------------------------- > Patching file Jamroot using Plan A... > Hunk #1 succeeded at 138. > Hunk #2 succeeded at 370. > Hunk #3 succeeded at 391. > done > ===> Applying OpenBSD patch > patch-boost_archive_impl_basic_text_iprimitive_ipp > Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... > The text leading up to this was: > -------------------------- > |$OpenBSD: patch-boost_archive_impl_basic_text_iprimitive_ipp,v 1.2 > 2010/04/21 09:26:58 landry Exp $ > |--- boost/archive/impl/basic_text_iprimitive.ipp.orig Sat Dec 5 > 07:32:01 2009 > |+++ boost/archive/impl/basic_text_iprimitive.ipp Thu Apr 8 13:37:44 2010 > -------------------------- > Patching file boost/archive/impl/basic_text_iprimitive.ipp using Plan A... > Hunk #1 succeeded at 45. > done > ===> Applying OpenBSD patch > patch-boost_archive_iterators_remove_whitespace_hpp > Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... > The text leading up to this was: > -------------------------- > |$OpenBSD: patch-boost_archive_iterators_remove_whitespace_hpp,v 1.1 > 2010/03/30 11:01:10 robert Exp $ > |--- boost/archive/iterators/remove_whitespace.hpp.orig Sun Dec 20 > 14:40:29 2009 > |+++ boost/archive/iterators/remove_whitespace.hpp Sun Dec 20 19:07:34 2009 > -------------------------- > Patching file boost/archive/iterators/remove_whitespace.hpp using Plan A... > Hunk #1 succeeded at 16. > Hunk #2 succeeded at 25. > Hunk #3 succeeded at 72. > done > ===> Applying OpenBSD patch > patch-boost_asio_detail_pipe_select_interrupter_hpp > Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... > The text leading up to this was: > -------------------------- > |$OpenBSD: patch-boost_asio_detail_pipe_select_interrupter_hpp,v 1.1 > 2010/03/30 11:01:10 robert Exp $ > |--- boost/asio/detail/pipe_select_interrupter.hpp.orig Tue May 12 > 18:05:45 2009 > |+++ boost/asio/detail/pipe_select_interrupter.hpp Tue May 12 18:06:32 2009 > -------------------------- > Patching file boost/asio/detail/pipe_select_interrupter.hpp using Plan A... > Hunk #1 succeeded at 27. > done > ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-boost_asio_detail_socket_ops_hpp > Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... > The text leading up to this was: > -------------------------- > |$OpenBSD: patch-boost_asio_detail_socket_ops_hpp,v 1.1 2010/03/30 11:01:10 > robert Exp $ > |--- boost/asio/detail/socket_ops.hpp.orig Tue May 12 18:06:50 2009 > |+++ boost/asio/detail/socket_ops.hpp Tue May 12 18:07:35 2009 > -------------------------- > Patching file boost/asio/detail/socket_ops.hpp using Plan A... > Hunk #1 succeeded at 24. > done > ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-boost_config_stdlib_libstdcpp3_hpp > Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... > The text leading up to this was: > -------------------------- > |$OpenBSD: patch-boost_config_stdlib_libstdcpp3_hpp,v 1.5 2010/03/30 11:00:15 > robert Exp $ > |--- boost/config/stdlib/libstdcpp3.hpp.orig Tue May 12 18:09:45 2009 > |+++ boost/config/stdlib/libstdcpp3.hpp Tue May 12 18:15:20 2009 > -------------------------- > Patching file boost/config/stdlib/libstdcpp3.hpp using Plan A... > Hunk #1 succeeded at 29. > Hunk #2 succeeded at 55. > done > ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-boost_config_suffix_hpp > Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... > The text leading up to this was: > -------------------------- > |$OpenBSD: patch-boost_config_suffix_hpp,v 1.7 2010/03/30 11:00:15 robert Exp > $ > |--- boost/config/suffix.hpp.orig Tue May 12 18:19:58 2009 > |+++ boost/config/suffix.hpp Tue May 12 18:21:48 2009 > -------------------------- > Patching file boost/config/suffix.hpp using Plan A... > Hunk #1 succeeded at 225. > done > ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-boost_detail_atomic_count_hpp > Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... > The text leading up to this was: > -------------------------- > |$OpenBSD: patch-boost_detail_atomic_count_hpp,v 1.1 2008/06/05 12:55:56 kurt > Exp $ > |--- boost/detail/atomic_count.hpp.orig Wed Mar 30 17:52:54 2005 > |+++ boost/detail/atomic_count.hpp Thu Jun 5 07:17:02 2008 > -------------------------- > Patching file boost/detail/atomic_count.hpp using Plan A... > No such line 92 in input file, ignoring > Hunk #1 failed at 93. > 1 out of 1 hunks failed--saving rejects to boost/detail/atomic_count.hpp.rej > done > ***> patch-boost_detail_atomic_count_hpp did not apply cleanly > ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-boost_detail_endian_hpp > Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... > The text leading up to this was: > -------------------------- > |$OpenBSD: patch-boost_detail_endian_hpp,v 1.3 2010/04/21 09:26:58 landry Exp > $ > |--- boost/detail/endian.hpp.orig Wed Apr 21 09:36:53 2010 > |+++ boost/detail/endian.hpp Wed Apr 21 09:42:41 2010 > -------------------------- > Patching file boost/detail/endian.hpp using Plan A... > Hunk #1 succeeded at 65. > done > ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-boost_function_function_base_hpp > Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... > The text leading up to this was: > -------------------------- > |$OpenBSD: patch-boost_function_function_base_hpp,v 1.1 2008/04/03 07:44:40 > bernd Exp $ > |--- boost/function/function_base.hpp.orig Wed Jan 9 06:44:14 2008 > |+++ boost/function/function_base.hpp Wed Jan 9 06:44:55 2008 > -------------------------- > Patching file boost/function/function_base.hpp using Plan A... > Hunk #1 failed at 15. > Hunk #2 succeeded at 53 with fuzz 2 (offset 22 lines). > Hunk #3 failed at 96. > Hunk #4 failed at 235. > Hunk #5 failed at 252. > Hunk #6 failed at 302. > Hunk #7 failed at 324. > Hunk #8 failed at 385. > Hunk #9 succeeded at 511 (offset 128 lines). > Hunk #10 failed at 608. > Hunk #11 failed at 631. > Hunk #12 failed at 709. > Hunk #13 succeeded at 791 with fuzz 1 (offset 36 lines). > 10 out of 13 hunks failed--saving rejects to > boost/function/function_base.hpp.rej > done > ***> patch-boost_function_function_base_hpp did not apply cleanly > ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-boost_function_function_template_hpp > Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... > The text leading up to this was: > -------------------------- > |$OpenBSD: patch-boost_function_function_template_hpp,v 1.3 2010/04/30 > 20:08:02 espie Exp $ > |--- boost/function/function_template.hpp.orig Fri Apr 30 21:01:11 2010 > |+++ boost/function/function_template.hpp Fri Apr 30 21:02:15 2010 > -------------------------- > Patching file boost/function/function_template.hpp using Plan A... > Hunk #1 succeeded at 1000. > done > ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-boost_math_special_functions_expm1_hpp > Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... > The text leading up to this was: > -------------------------- > |$OpenBSD: patch-boost_math_special_functions_expm1_hpp,v 1.1 2010/05/26 > 12:25:23 espie Exp $ > |--- boost/math/special_functions/expm1.hpp.orig Wed May 26 11:30:30 2010 > |+++ boost/math/special_functions/expm1.hpp Wed May 26 11:31:54 2010 > -------------------------- > Patching file boost/math/special_functions/expm1.hpp using Plan A... > Hunk #1 succeeded at 268. > done > ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-boost_math_special_functions_log1p_hpp > Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... > The text leading up to this was: > -------------------------- > |$OpenBSD: patch-boost_math_special_functions_log1p_hpp,v 1.1 2010/05/26 > 12:25:23 espie Exp $ > |--- boost/math/special_functions/log1p.hpp.orig Wed May 26 11:33:17 2010 > |+++ boost/math/special_functions/log1p.hpp Wed May 26 11:33:39 2010 > -------------------------- > Patching file boost/math/special_functions/log1p.hpp using Plan A... > Hunk #1 succeeded at 329. > Hunk #2 succeeded at 341. > done > ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-boost_math_tools_config_hpp > Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... > The text leading up to this was: > -------------------------- > |$OpenBSD: patch-boost_math_tools_config_hpp,v 1.1 2010/04/13 17:15:28 landry > Exp $ > |--- boost/math/tools/config.hpp.orig Mon Apr 12 06:14:08 2010 > |+++ boost/math/tools/config.hpp Mon Apr 12 06:14:38 2010 > -------------------------- > Patching file boost/math/tools/config.hpp using Plan A... > Hunk #1 succeeded at 24. > done > ===> Applying OpenBSD patch > patch-boost_property_tree_detail_xml_parser_read_rapidxml_hpp > Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... > The text leading up to this was: > -------------------------- > |$OpenBSD: patch-boost_property_tree_detail_xml_parser_read_rapidxml_hpp,v > 1.1 2010/04/21 09:26:58 landry Exp $ > |Cf http://lists.boost.org/boost-users/2009/11/53805.php > |--- boost/property_tree/detail/xml_parser_read_rapidxml.hpp.orig Thu Apr > 8 13:58:33 2010 > |+++ boost/property_tree/detail/xml_parser_read_rapidxml.hpp Thu Apr 8 > 14:10:47 2010 > -------------------------- > Patching file boost/property_tree/detail/xml_parser_read_rapidxml.hpp using > Plan A... > Hunk #1 succeeded at 118. > done > ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-boost_regex_config_hpp > Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... > The text leading up to this was: > -------------------------- > |$OpenBSD: patch-boost_regex_config_hpp,v 1.2 2010/03/30 11:00:15 robert Exp $ > |--- boost/regex/config.hpp.orig Sat Dec 26 15:48:19 2009 > |+++ boost/regex/config.hpp Sat Dec 26 15:48:34 2009 > -------------------------- > Patching file boost/regex/config.hpp using Plan A... > Hunk #1 succeeded at 75. > done > ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-boost_regex_v4_basic_regex_parser_hpp > Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... > The text leading up to this was: > -------------------------- > |$OpenBSD: patch-boost_regex_v4_basic_regex_parser_hpp,v 1.1 2008/05/27 > 00:52:01 deanna Exp $ > |--- boost/regex/v4/basic_regex_parser.hpp.orig Wed Dec 20 12:19:05 2006 > |+++ boost/regex/v4/basic_regex_parser.hpp Sun May 25 21:59:07 2008 > -------------------------- > Patching file boost/regex/v4/basic_regex_parser.hpp using Plan A... > Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected! Assume -R? [y] > Hunk #1 succeeded at 970 (offset 193 lines). > Hunk #2 succeeded at 2278 (offset 416 lines). > Hunk #3 failed at 2286. > 1 out of 3 hunks failed--saving rejects to > boost/regex/v4/basic_regex_parser.hpp.rej > done > ***> patch-boost_regex_v4_basic_regex_parser_hpp did not apply cleanly > ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-boost_regex_v4_c_regex_traits_hpp > Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... > The text leading up to this was: > -------------------------- > |$OpenBSD: patch-boost_regex_v4_c_regex_traits_hpp,v 1.1 2010/03/30 11:01:10 > robert Exp $ > |--- boost/regex/v4/c_regex_traits.hpp.orig Tue Dec 22 17:25:03 2009 > |+++ boost/regex/v4/c_regex_traits.hpp Thu Dec 24 14:05:47 2009 > -------------------------- > Patching file boost/regex/v4/c_regex_traits.hpp using Plan A... > Hunk #1 succeeded at 34. > done > ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-boost_smart_ptr_detail_atomic_count_hpp > Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... > The text leading up to this was: > -------------------------- > |$OpenBSD: patch-boost_smart_ptr_detail_atomic_count_hpp,v 1.1 2010/03/30 > 11:01:10 robert Exp $ > |--- boost/smart_ptr/detail/atomic_count.hpp.orig Tue May 12 18:25:41 2009 > |+++ boost/smart_ptr/detail/atomic_count.hpp Tue May 12 18:34:18 2009 > -------------------------- > Patching file boost/smart_ptr/detail/atomic_count.hpp using Plan A... > Hunk #1 succeeded at 101. > done > ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-boost_test_impl_execution_monitor_ipp > Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... > The text leading up to this was: > -------------------------- > |$OpenBSD: patch-boost_test_impl_execution_monitor_ipp,v 1.2 2010/09/19 > 20:47:29 jasper Exp $ > |--- boost/test/impl/execution_monitor.ipp.orig Sat Nov 28 10:19:18 2009 > |+++ boost/test/impl/execution_monitor.ipp Sun Sep 19 22:33:20 2010 > -------------------------- > Patching file boost/test/impl/execution_monitor.ipp using Plan A... > Hunk #1 succeeded at 341. > done > ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-boost_throw_exception_hpp > Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... > The text leading up to this was: > -------------------------- > |$OpenBSD: patch-boost_throw_exception_hpp,v 1.2 2010/04/21 09:26:58 landry > Exp $ > |Fix for /usr/local/include/boost/throw_exception.hpp:57: warning: > |`inline' is not at beginning of declaration which makes -Werror > |configure scripts bomb > |--- boost/throw_exception.hpp.orig Tue Dec 22 21:59:23 2009 > |+++ boost/throw_exception.hpp Thu Apr 8 13:36:37 2010 > -------------------------- > Patching file boost/throw_exception.hpp using Plan A... > Hunk #1 succeeded at 55. > done > ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-boost_wave_token_ids_hpp > Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... > The text leading up to this was: > -------------------------- > |$OpenBSD: patch-boost_wave_token_ids_hpp,v 1.3 2010/03/30 11:01:10 robert > Exp $ > |--- boost/wave/token_ids.hpp.orig Sun Dec 20 19:48:02 2009 > |+++ boost/wave/token_ids.hpp Sun Dec 20 19:49:32 2009 > -------------------------- > Patching file boost/wave/token_ids.hpp using Plan A... > Hunk #1 succeeded at 27. > done > ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-configure > Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... > The text leading up to this was: > -------------------------- > |$OpenBSD: patch-configure,v 1.2 2008/04/03 07:44:40 bernd Exp $ > |--- configure.orig Thu May 10 01:09:39 2007 > |+++ configure Wed Jan 9 08:01:33 2008 > -------------------------- > File to patch: > No file found--skip this patch? [n] > File to patch: > No file found--skip this patch? [n] > File to patch: > No file found--skip this patch? [n] > File to patch: > No file found--skip this patch? [n] y > Skipping patch... > Hunk #1 ignored at 9. > Hunk #2 ignored at 325. > 2 out of 2 hunks ignored--saving rejects to Oops.rej > done > ***> patch-configure did not apply cleanly > ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-libs_config_configure > Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... > The text leading up to this was: > -------------------------- > |$OpenBSD: patch-libs_config_configure,v 1.2 2008/01/06 00:01:15 deanna Exp $ > |--- libs/config/configure.orig Thu Nov 3 06:23:34 2005 > |+++ libs/config/configure Mon Dec 31 02:29:05 2007 > -------------------------- > Patching file libs/config/configure using Plan A... > Hunk #1 succeeded at 1955. > Hunk #2 succeeded at 2024. > done > ===> Applying OpenBSD patch > patch-libs_config_test_boost_has_clock_gettime_ipp > Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... > The text leading up to this was: > -------------------------- > |$OpenBSD: patch-libs_config_test_boost_has_clock_gettime_ipp,v 1.2 > 2010/03/30 11:00:15 robert Exp $ > |--- libs/config/test/boost_has_clock_gettime.ipp.orig Tue May 12 > 18:35:20 2009 > |+++ libs/config/test/boost_has_clock_gettime.ipp Tue May 12 18:35:43 2009 > -------------------------- > Patching file libs/config/test/boost_has_clock_gettime.ipp using Plan A... > Hunk #1 succeeded at 10. > done > ===> Applying OpenBSD patch > patch-libs_config_test_boost_has_pthread_yield_ipp > Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... > The text leading up to this was: > -------------------------- > |$OpenBSD: patch-libs_config_test_boost_has_pthread_yield_ipp,v 1.2 > 2010/03/30 11:00:15 robert Exp $ > |--- libs/config/test/boost_has_pthread_yield.ipp.orig Tue May 12 > 18:36:21 2009 > |+++ libs/config/test/boost_has_pthread_yield.ipp Tue May 12 18:36:56 2009 > -------------------------- > Patching file libs/config/test/boost_has_pthread_yield.ipp using Plan A... > Hunk #1 succeeded at 17. > done > ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-libs_detail_utf8_codecvt_facet_cpp > Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... > The text leading up to this was: > -------------------------- > |$OpenBSD: patch-libs_detail_utf8_codecvt_facet_cpp,v 1.1 2010/03/30 11:01:10 > robert Exp $ > |--- libs/detail/utf8_codecvt_facet.cpp.orig Sun Dec 20 11:11:19 2009 > |+++ libs/detail/utf8_codecvt_facet.cpp Sun Dec 20 11:21:24 2009 > -------------------------- > Patching file libs/detail/utf8_codecvt_facet.cpp using Plan A... > Hunk #1 succeeded at 13. > done > ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-libs_random_random_device_cpp > Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... > The text leading up to this was: > -------------------------- > |$OpenBSD: patch-libs_random_random_device_cpp,v 1.2 2010/03/30 11:00:15 > robert Exp $ > |--- libs/random/random_device.cpp.orig Tue May 12 18:37:39 2009 > |+++ libs/random/random_device.cpp Tue May 12 18:38:44 2009 > -------------------------- > Patching file libs/random/random_device.cpp using Plan A... > Hunk #1 succeeded at 22. > Hunk #2 succeeded at 90. > done > ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-libs_regex_src_regex_traits_defaults_cpp > Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... > The text leading up to this was: > -------------------------- > |$OpenBSD: patch-libs_regex_src_regex_traits_defaults_cpp,v 1.1 2010/03/30 > 11:01:10 robert Exp $ > |--- libs/regex/src/regex_traits_defaults.cpp.orig Thu Dec 24 14:06:42 2009 > |+++ libs/regex/src/regex_traits_defaults.cpp Thu Dec 24 14:08:17 2009 > -------------------------- > Patching file libs/regex/src/regex_traits_defaults.cpp using Plan A... > Hunk #1 succeeded at 35. > done > ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-libs_regex_src_wc_regex_traits_cpp > Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... > The text leading up to this was: > -------------------------- > |$OpenBSD: patch-libs_regex_src_wc_regex_traits_cpp,v 1.2 2010/03/30 11:00:15 > robert Exp $ > |--- libs/regex/src/wc_regex_traits.cpp.orig Mon Aug 3 14:00:07 2009 > |+++ libs/regex/src/wc_regex_traits.cpp Thu Dec 24 14:11:11 2009 > -------------------------- > Patching file libs/regex/src/wc_regex_traits.cpp using Plan A... > Hunk #1 succeeded at 77. > done > ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-libs_regex_test_regress_test_perl_ex_cpp > Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... > The text leading up to this was: > -------------------------- > |$OpenBSD: patch-libs_regex_test_regress_test_perl_ex_cpp,v 1.1 2008/05/27 > 00:52:01 deanna Exp $ > |--- libs/regex/test/regress/test_perl_ex.cpp.orig Wed Sep 14 08:20:08 2005 > |+++ libs/regex/test/regress/test_perl_ex.cpp Sun May 25 21:59:48 2008 > -------------------------- > Patching file libs/regex/test/regress/test_perl_ex.cpp using Plan A... > Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected! Assume -R? [y] > Hunk #1 succeeded at 121. > done > ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-libs_serialization_build_Jamfile_v2 > Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... > The text leading up to this was: > -------------------------- > |$OpenBSD: patch-libs_serialization_build_Jamfile_v2,v 1.1 2008/04/03 > 07:44:40 bernd Exp $ > |--- libs/serialization/build/Jamfile.v2.orig Wed Jan 9 23:17:23 2008 > |+++ libs/serialization/build/Jamfile.v2 Wed Jan 9 23:17:31 2008 > -------------------------- > Patching file libs/serialization/build/Jamfile.v2 using Plan A... > Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected! Assume -R? [y] > Hunk #1 succeeded at 61 with fuzz 2. > done > ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-libs_serialization_src_stl_port_cpp > Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... > The text leading up to this was: > -------------------------- > |$OpenBSD: patch-libs_serialization_src_stl_port_cpp,v 1.2 2008/01/06 > 00:01:15 deanna Exp $ > |--- libs/serialization/src/stl_port.cpp.orig Sat Feb 19 16:08:02 2005 > |+++ libs/serialization/src/stl_port.cpp Mon Dec 31 02:29:05 2007 > -------------------------- > Patching file libs/serialization/src/stl_port.cpp using Plan A... > Hunk #1 succeeded at 31 (offset -1 lines). > done > ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-libs_serialization_test_Jamfile_v2 > Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... > The text leading up to this was: > -------------------------- > |$OpenBSD: patch-libs_serialization_test_Jamfile_v2,v 1.1 2008/04/03 07:44:40 > bernd Exp $ > |--- libs/serialization/test/Jamfile.v2.orig Wed Jan 9 21:54:47 2008 > |+++ libs/serialization/test/Jamfile.v2 Wed Jan 9 21:54:51 2008 > -------------------------- > Patching file libs/serialization/test/Jamfile.v2 using Plan A... > Hunk #1 failed at 114. > Hunk #2 failed at 133. > 2 out of 2 hunks failed--saving rejects to > libs/serialization/test/Jamfile.v2.rej > done > ***> patch-libs_serialization_test_Jamfile_v2 did not apply cleanly > ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-tools_build_v2_tools_gcc_jam > Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... > The text leading up to this was: > -------------------------- > |$OpenBSD: patch-tools_build_v2_tools_gcc_jam,v 1.3 2010/03/30 11:00:15 > robert Exp $ > |--- tools/build/v2/tools/gcc.jam.orig Wed Oct 28 08:47:51 2009 > |+++ tools/build/v2/tools/gcc.jam Sat Dec 26 09:57:06 2009 > -------------------------- > Patching file tools/build/v2/tools/gcc.jam using Plan A... > Hunk #1 succeeded at 269. > Hunk #2 succeeded at 299. > Hunk #3 succeeded at 473. > Hunk #4 succeeded at 797. > Hunk #5 succeeded at 858. > done > ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-tools_build_v2_tools_python_jam > Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... > The text leading up to this was: > -------------------------- > |$OpenBSD: patch-tools_build_v2_tools_python_jam,v 1.3 2009/07/27 00:34:24 > kurt Exp $ > |--- tools/build/v2/tools/python.jam.orig Wed Jan 9 03:11:51 2008 > |+++ tools/build/v2/tools/python.jam Wed Jan 9 03:16:32 2008 > -------------------------- > Patching file tools/build/v2/tools/python.jam using Plan A... > Hunk #1 succeeded at 648 with fuzz 1 (offset 25 lines). > done > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/ports/devel/boost (line 2347 of > /usr/ports/infrastructure/mk/bsd.port.mk). > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/ports/devel/boost (line 2222 of > /usr/ports/infrastructure/mk/bsd.port.mk). > $ exit > > Script done on Wed Nov 24 02:45:22 2010
