David Coppa <[email protected]> wrote: > Upstream said "that one is more a problem with the test than with > CELT itself." > See: http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/celt-dev/2010-November/000519.html
I wonder if this is also intentional: Encoded with CELT 0.9.1 (bitstream: -2147483634) Weird version number. But it's in the code: libcelt/modes.h:#define CELT_BITSTREAM_VERSION 0x8000000e *shrug* -- Christian "naddy" Weisgerber [email protected]
