On 2010/12/14 18:05, Federico G. Schwindt wrote: > On Mon, Dec 06, 2010 at 02:43:45PM +0100, Joachim Schipper wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 06, 2010 at 02:47:26PM +0200, Alexey Suslikov wrote: > > > Marc Espie wrote: > > > > On Sun, Dec 05, 2010 at 06:20:51PM +0100, Landry Breuil wrote: > > > > > To be honest, i doubt a js framework has its place in the portstree. > > > > > Usually you just unzip stuff directly in www dirs.. > > > > > > > > There's precedent for that. I don't see why not, especially if we can > > > > share stuff. > > > > > > To share stuff like that nowadays people use CDNs. > > > > > > http://code.google.com/apis/libraries/devguide.html#dojo > > > > There are some disadvantages to that, e.g. a connection to an extra > > domain and reliance on Google. It's not *always* the best solution. > > actually using a separate domain might be an advantange in some cases.
absolutely; especially if your main domain is using cookies or something else which breaks HTTP caching.
