hmm, on Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 10:45:27AM +0000, Stuart Henderson said that > On 2011/01/17 21:29, Damien Miller wrote: > > Hi, > > > > This adds support for archivers/xz compressed archivers via EXTRACT_SUFX. > > > > Comments? Ok? > > proposed numerous times before, we need more things in ports using > xz before we do this..
really not to troll here, i am just trying understand the rationale. why is this a problem? it's basically for free, practically a cosmetic change.. why not get ahead of the curve once in a while? :} -f -- there is an exception to every rule, except this one.
