On Tue, Mar 08, 2011 at 09:54:08PM +0100, Landry Breuil wrote: > On Tue, Mar 08, 2011 at 04:40:20PM +0100, David Coppa wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 4:28 PM, Landry Breuil <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Tue, Mar 08, 2011 at 03:09:26PM +0100, David Coppa wrote: > > >> I'm resending this one after the unlock. > > >> > > >> The attached patch (re-)enable system cairo support for > > >> mozilla-firefox and mozilla-thunderbird (the only ports in our tree > > >> that are based on mozilla 1.9.2 branch). > > >> > > >> cairo-1.10.2 has solved most of the problems that forced us to switch > > >> to internal cairo. The only remaining one is with animated gifs, which > > >> is solved by this patch cherrypicked from gentoo. > > > > > > I'll look at that soonish.. can you add links to gentoo bug report/patch > > > source/mozilla bug report in the patches ? > > > > Ok, I will. > > > > This is the url: http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=337813 > > > > Basically, it's a backport from ffox4 code (the patch has been done by > > Rafal Muzylo) > > I did some digging.. it looks like the whole patch is > http://hg.mozilla.org/releases/mozilla-2.0/rev/7c7debeec5a2 and > http://hg.mozilla.org/releases/mozilla-2.0/rev/f70db887a173 , right ? > > I can't find the patch in gentoo cvs, > Is http://bugs.gentoo.org/attachment.cgi?id=256003&action=diff the only > source ?
Ok, found more sources/references, the main bug report being : https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=597174 last comment points to three other bug reports, which states the corresponding patches are pending approval for 1.9.2.x branch (which would be next ffx 3.6) If those patches are the same than gentoo's patches and you put the relevant bz/commit links in the patches, then it's ok for me. Oh, and check WANTLIB of course.. Landry
