On Wed Mar 23, 2011 at 06:07:27PM +0100, Mike Belopuhov wrote: > On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 11:32 PM, Peter Valchev <pvalc...@openbsd.org> wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 1:22 PM, Rafael Sadowski <raf...@sizeofvoid.org> > > wrote: > >> On Fri Mar 18, 2011 at 09:17:23PM +0500, Alexandr Shadchin wrote: > >>> I prepared diff update x11/fvwm2 to 2.5.31 (on request and test mikeb@) > >>> > >>> current x11/fvwm2 - 2.4.20 (stable branch) > >>> last version fvwm2 - 2.5.31 (unstable branch) > >>> > >>> mikeb@ work with 2.5, no regression found. > >>> > >>> What should I do? Update current port, or separate port(fvwm2-devel)? > >>> > >> I don't think that any work with stable branch. In my opinion, separate > >> port like fvwm2-devel is the best choice but perhaps, a port like mutt > >> with subdirs stable and snapshot (for fvmw unsable) is also good. > > > > Previously it seemed silly to have 2 versions... what's the motivation > > not to stick with -stable? I'm really curious. > > > > because 2.5 has unicode and freetype support. > ... don't forget svg/png (for me really important) support and some cool new fvwm functions!
-- http://www.sizeofvoid.org - raf...@sizeofvoid.org XMPP: z...@jabber.ccc.de Key fingerprint: BDDD 91E9 28CB 3A52 3E99 61B0 C359 2691 BAC6 A3B1