On Wed Mar 23, 2011 at 06:07:27PM +0100, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 11:32 PM, Peter Valchev <pvalc...@openbsd.org> wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 1:22 PM, Rafael Sadowski <raf...@sizeofvoid.org> 
> > wrote:
> >> On Fri Mar 18, 2011 at 09:17:23PM +0500, Alexandr Shadchin wrote:
> >>> I prepared diff update x11/fvwm2 to 2.5.31 (on request and test mikeb@)
> >>>
> >>> current x11/fvwm2 - 2.4.20 (stable branch)
> >>> last version fvwm2 - 2.5.31 (unstable branch)
> >>>
> >>> mikeb@ work with 2.5, no regression found.
> >>>
> >>> What should I do? Update current port, or separate port(fvwm2-devel)?
> >>>
> >> I don't think that any work with stable branch. In my opinion, separate
> >> port like fvwm2-devel is the best choice but perhaps, a port like mutt
> >> with subdirs stable and snapshot (for fvmw unsable) is also good.
> >
> > Previously it seemed silly to have 2 versions... what's the motivation
> > not to stick with -stable? I'm really curious.
> >
> 
> because 2.5 has unicode and freetype support.
> 
... don't forget svg/png (for me really important) support and some
cool new fvwm functions!

-- 
http://www.sizeofvoid.org - raf...@sizeofvoid.org
XMPP: z...@jabber.ccc.de
Key fingerprint: BDDD 91E9 28CB 3A52 3E99  61B0 C359 2691 BAC6 A3B1

Reply via email to