On 2011-04-25, Mikolaj Kucharski <miko...@kucharski.name> wrote: > On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 07:46:36PM +0000, Stuart Henderson wrote: >> On 2011-04-25, Mikolaj Kucharski <miko...@kucharski.name> wrote: >> > On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 08:18:54PM +0600, Alexandr Shadchin wrote: >> >> add all the possible flavor combinations in @pkgpath, thanks >> > >> >> +@pkgpath x11/fvwm2,-fvwm2,i18n >> >> +@pkgpath x11/fvwm2,-fvwm2,i18n,rplay >> >> +@pkgpath x11/fvwm2,-fvwm2,i18n,debug >> >> +@pkgpath x11/fvwm2,-fvwm2,i18n,rplay,debug >> > >> >> +@pkgpath x11/fvwm2,-main,i18n >> >> +@pkgpath x11/fvwm2,-main,i18n,rplay >> >> +@pkgpath x11/fvwm2,-main,i18n,debug >> >> +@pkgpath x11/fvwm2,-main,i18n,rplay,debug >> > >> > Is alphabetic order important when listing possible flavors? Just >> > wondering should debug be before rplay, or does order not matter? >> >> >From what I remember, each @pkgpath line must have flavours in order of how >> they appear in the FLAVORS variable i.e. > > Ok, that makes sense. But is FLAVORS sorted in bsd.port.mk? I should > probably check that myself..
No, it is taken directly from the port's Makefile. Have a play with 'make show=FULLPKGPATH' with different FLAVORs set. >> @pkgpath x11/fvwm2,-fvwm2,i18n >> @pkgpath x11/fvwm2,-fvwm2,rplay,i18n >> @pkgpath x11/fvwm2,-fvwm2,debug,i18n >> @pkgpath x11/fvwm2,-fvwm2,rplay,debug,i18n >> @pkgpath x11/fvwm2,-main,i18n >> @pkgpath x11/fvwm2,-main,rplay,i18n >> @pkgpath x11/fvwm2,-main,debug,i18n >> @pkgpath x11/fvwm2,-main,rplay,debug,i18n >
