On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 11:24:19AM +0200, David Coppa wrote: > On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 11:18 AM, Stuart Henderson <[email protected]> > wrote: > > On 2011/06/14 11:09, Marc Espie wrote: > >> > most ports should have libexecinfo as an optional dependency... > >> > btw, why marco's backtrace library is not in ports? After we have > >> > removed libexecinfo (if we decide to do so) we could use it as a > >> > libexecinfo replacement. Just my 2 cents... > >> > >> If both libraries offer the same functionality, doing a frontend api to > >> libbacktrace to do what libexecinfo does would be cool... > > > > IIRC it implements the same functions, so I think we can just rename it. > > cool. Then I'm all in favor of taking this route. > > ciao, > david >
agreed. -- Cheers, Jasper "Capable, generous men do not create victims, they nurture them."
