On Wed, 29 Jun 2011, Antoine Jacoutot wrote: > > 1. I forgot which ports where involved in the circular dependencies > > (it wasn't a direct cups <-> ghostscript tie); does anyone remember? > > IIRC cups used to run_depends on foomatic-filters (which depends on gs). > That is not the case anymore. > > > 2. If I put the new gstoraster program into a subpackage, depending on > > cups and ghostscript (-main), would this be a problem? > > On the contrary, I think it would be a perfectly fine solution.
Matthias, I forgot to mention, please add a pstoraster -> gstoraster symlink in the pkg. -- Antoine
