On Sat, Jul 02, 2011 at 11:14:59AM -0500, Amit Kulkarni wrote: > does make plist solve the problem? Sometimes updating plist is really > needed. IMHO, this should be automated because sometimes porters > forget to update plist, i.e after make fake, make plist should be > called.
nope, can't be automated. make update-plist can't be 100% for a lot of reasons. In many cases, when things don't match, it means a deeper problem that requires human intervention. if you value the quality of packages, you can't fully automate that process.
