* Todd T. Fries <t...@openbsd.org> [2011-07-29 23:01]: > Penned by Stuart Henderson on 20110729 5:43.55, we have: > | On 2011-07-29, David Coppa <dco...@gmail.com> wrote: > | > It should be better to not lure people into using kqemu: it's buggy > | > and unmaintained > | > | How about this ... Brad? Todd? any developers who need qemu? > | OK? > > Sounds like henning@ was one who complained about slowness in the past, but > he is definately using the newer one in most places now.
indeed, the newer one is ok now. > One comment was that perhaps the upgrade to qemu from qemu-old be handled > properly, then this can get removed... yup -- Henning Brauer, h...@bsws.de, henn...@openbsd.org BS Web Services, http://bsws.de, Full-Service ISP Secure Hosting, Mail and DNS Services. Dedicated Servers, Root to Fully Managed Henning Brauer Consulting, http://henningbrauer.com/