* Todd T. Fries <t...@openbsd.org> [2011-07-29 23:01]:
> Penned by Stuart Henderson on 20110729  5:43.55, we have:
> | On 2011-07-29, David Coppa <dco...@gmail.com> wrote:
> | > It should be better to not lure people into using kqemu: it's buggy
> | > and unmaintained
> | 
> | How about this ... Brad? Todd? any developers who need qemu?
> | OK?
> 
> Sounds like henning@ was one who complained about slowness in the past, but
> he is definately using the newer one in most places now.

indeed, the newer one is ok now.

> One comment was that perhaps the upgrade to qemu from qemu-old be handled
> properly, then this can get removed...

yup

-- 
Henning Brauer, h...@bsws.de, henn...@openbsd.org
BS Web Services, http://bsws.de, Full-Service ISP
Secure Hosting, Mail and DNS Services. Dedicated Servers, Root to Fully Managed
Henning Brauer Consulting, http://henningbrauer.com/

Reply via email to