+-------------------+             .:\:\:/:/:.
              |   PLEASE DO NOT   |            :.:\:\:/:/:.:
              |  FEED THE TROLLS  |           :=.' -   - '.=:
              |                   |           '=(\ 9   9 /)='
              |                   |              (  (_)  )
              |                   |              /`-vvv-'\
              +-------------------+             /         \
                      |  |        @@@          / /|,,,,,|\ \
                      |  |        @@@         /_//  /^\  \\_\
        @x@@x@        |  |         |/         WW(  (   )  )WW
        \||||/        |  |        \|           __\,,\ /,,/__
         \||/         |  |         |          (______Y______)
     /\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\//\/\\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\
 ======================================================================

On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 03:51:46PM -0300, Zantgo wrote:
> Subject: which branch should follow?
> From: Zantgo <zan...@gmail.com>
> Message-Id: <75e176cb-da0a-4e1d-8825-483201c38...@gmail.com>
> Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 15:51:46 -0300
> To: "ports@openbsd.org" <ports@openbsd.org>
> 
> The question is, if I am dealing with the RELEASE amd64/4.9, updating the SRC 
> and the Ports of cvs, which should occupy according to the manual upgrade 
> to-current or-stable, for example, where it says this:
> 
> "To use ports, it is similar to src:
> 
> (If you are Following current):
> 
> # Cd / usr
> # Cvs-qd anon...@anoncvs.ca.openbsd.org: / cvs get-P ports
> (If you are Following the patch branch for 4.9):
> 
> # Cd / usr
> # Cvs-qd anon...@anoncvs.ca.openbsd.org: / cvs get-P ports-rOPENBSD_4_9
> Anytime Afterwards, to `update 'this tree:
> (If you are Following current):
> 
> # Cd / usr / ports
> # Cvs-q up-Pd
> (If you are Following the patch branch for 4.9):
> 
> # Cd / usr / ports
> # Cvs-q up-Pd-rOPENBSD_4_9 "
> 
> Which branch should follow the-current or-stable?
> 
> PS: I want to have very updated ports, but do not want an unstable system
> 
> http://www.openbsd.org/anoncvs.html
> 
> Zantgo

Reply via email to