On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 08:27:10PM +0100, Matthias Kilian wrote:
> But there's some ugliness: hs-xhtml (as any normal haskell library)
> build_depends on devel/haddock, but devel/haddock build_depends on
> hs-xhtml. We already had the same for devel/haddock and devel/hs-ghc-paths
> and I solved this by not building the haddock documentation for it.
> However, for hs-xhtml I think the documentation should be built.
> To solve this, www/hs-xhtml has a flavor `no_haddock' which doesn't
> depend on haddock and which will create a package without the haddock
> documentation. I changed devel/hs-ghc-paths to match this behaviour.
Please ignore this. I think it's much simpler to replace the xhtml
library within ghc and keep it in the ghc package.
Ciao,
Kili
