Antti Harri: > Makes sense. Can someone check the attached tarball? I'm sure it has room for > improvement as I did it pretty hastily. I'm going to call it a day so I'm > submitting it now. :-) > > Can some of the pkgpath/conflict markers be combined and are they correct?
They look fine to me. I think we'll also need quirk entries, won't we? These ports will need to have their dependencies updated: editors/libreoffice graphics/makehuman sysutils/backintime/common > Does the .so in libexec need special handling? Theoretically, this and the rest of the (g)stdbuf command should go into PFRAG.shared. In practice, I can't find any provisions for platforms without dynamic linking. We could disable the port for NO_SHARED_ARCHS, but I think it's better to allow building it there and accept that some parts won't work. The sole affected arch, vax, can't uncompress the tarball anyway. Some further comments: I think the port should go into sysutils. That's probably sufficient for CATEGORIES, too. Why did you add NO_REGRESS? This is wrong. The configure script tries to pick up gmp. I have no particular opinion whether we want this, it only affects the factor and expr commands, but we should either fully enable it (LIB_DEPENDS, CPPFLAGS/LDFLAGS) or disable it (--without-gmp). -- Christian "naddy" Weisgerber [email protected]
