On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 12:19:21PM +0200, Simon Kuhnle wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 09:04:30PM +0200, Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado 
> wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 08:14:34PM +0300, Artturi Alm wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > 
> > > WeeChat is a fast, light and extensible chat client.
> > > http://www.weechat.org
> > > 
> > > This is my first try at making a port, tested only on amd64.
> > > While atleast current stable(0.3.8) still has autoconf support,
> > > I ran into some problems and decided to go with cmake.
> > > 
> > > OT: missing comments about cmake in the Makefile.template,
> > > and in port-modules(5) made me feel like using it is discouraged?
> > 
> > Related: https://github.com/jasperla/openbsd-wip/tree/master/net/weechat
> 
> I just updated that one to 0.3.8, too
> (also attached it to this mail, for the lazy).
> 
> It seems like everybody tries his own port of
> this software, instead of testing or commenting on existing ones.
> 
> "My" port (based on on the work of others, Jona Joachim in this case)
> seems to be the only one that uses the MULTI_PACKAGE feature for the
> different plugins that weechat supports.
> 
> I tested weechat on amd64 and sparc64 so far
> and others report that Loongson works as well.
> 
> The only problem I am aware of at the moment is that I can't convince
> cmake to install the man page to ${PREFIX}/man/man1 instead of
> ${PREFIX}/share/man/man1. Does anybody know how to fix this?
> Do I need to patch CMakeLists.txt or something?

Yes, doc/CMakeLists.txt installs the manpage to sharedir/man/man1. I
think you'll need patching here.

Landry

Reply via email to