On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 11:04:04AM +0200, Manuel Giraud wrote: > Josh Elsasser <[email protected]> writes: > > > On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 10:54:26AM +0200, Manuel Giraud wrote: > >> Here is an update for sbcl. Tested on i386. 'make regress' passes now. > >> > > > > Looks good, however one nit is that the DISTFILES line is no longer > > needed at all, you're simply setting it to the default value. > > Ok, here's the updated version. And thanks, for testing. >
Took a few days longer than I expected, but worth it! Looks like 1.58 fixes a few regressions on macppc. i.e. Failure: float.pure.lisp / RANGE-REDUCTION Expected failure: debug.impure.lisp / (UNDEFINED-FUNCTION BUG-346) Expected failure: debug.impure.lisp / (UNDEFINED-FUNCTION BUG-353) Expected failure: dynamic-extent.impure.lisp / (NO-CONSING DX-RAW-INSTANCES) .... Ken ===> Regression check for sbcl-1.0.54 [[ snip ]] Finished running tests. Status: Expected failure: float.pure.lisp / (ADDITION-OVERFLOW BUG-372) Expected failure: float.pure.lisp / (ADDITION-OVERFLOW BUG-372 TAKE-2) Failure: float.pure.lisp / RANGE-REDUCTION Expected failure: interface.pure.lisp / (SLEEP NON-CONSING) Expected failure: debug.impure.lisp / (UNDEFINED-FUNCTION BUG-346) Expected failure: debug.impure.lisp / (UNDEFINED-FUNCTION BUG-353) Unexpected success: debug.impure.lisp / (TRACE ENCAPSULATE NIL) Unexpected success: debug.impure.lisp / (TRACE-RECURSIVE ENCAPSULATE NIL) Expected failure: dynamic-extent.impure.lisp / (NO-CONSING DX-RAW-INSTANCES) Failure: dynamic-extent.impure.lisp / (NO-CONSING HASH-TABLES) Expected failure: dynamic-extent.impure.lisp / HANDLER-CASE-BOGUS-COMPILER-NOTE Expected failure: dynamic-extent.impure.lisp / DX-COMPILER-NOTES Expected failure: dynamic-extent.impure.lisp / HANDLER-CASE-EATING-STACK Expected failure: dynamic-extent.impure.lisp / RECHECK-NESTED-DX-BUG Expected failure: dynamic-extent.impure.lisp / BUG-586105 Expected failure: packages.impure.lisp / USE-PACKAGE-CONFLICT-SET Expected failure: packages.impure.lisp / IMPORT-SINGLE-CONFLICT Skipped (broken): timer.impure.lisp / (TIMER PARALLEL-UNSCHEDULE) (51 tests skipped for this combination of platform and features) test failed, expected 104 return code, got 1 ===> Regression check for sbcl-1.0.58 [[ snip ]] Finished running tests. Status: Expected failure: float.pure.lisp / (ADDITION-OVERFLOW BUG-372) Expected failure: float.pure.lisp / (ADDITION-OVERFLOW BUG-372 TAKE-2) Expected failure: interface.pure.lisp / (SLEEP NON-CONSING) Unexpected success: debug.impure.lisp / (TRACE ENCAPSULATE NIL) Unexpected success: debug.impure.lisp / (TRACE-RECURSIVE ENCAPSULATE NIL) Failure: dynamic-extent.impure.lisp / (NO-CONSING HASH-TABLES) Expected failure: dynamic-extent.impure.lisp / HANDLER-CASE-BOGUS-COMPILER-NOTE Expected failure: dynamic-extent.impure.lisp / DX-COMPILER-NOTES Expected failure: dynamic-extent.impure.lisp / HANDLER-CASE-EATING-STACK Expected failure: dynamic-extent.impure.lisp / RECHECK-NESTED-DX-BUG Expected failure: dynamic-extent.impure.lisp / BUG-586105 Expected failure: packages.impure.lisp / USE-PACKAGE-CONFLICT-SET Expected failure: packages.impure.lisp / IMPORT-SINGLE-CONFLICT Skipped (broken): timer.impure.lisp / (TIMER PARALLEL-UNSCHEDULE) (52 tests skipped for this combination of platform and features) test failed, expected 104 return code, got 1
