10.10.2012 20:20 пользователь "Marc Espie" <[email protected]> написал: > > On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 07:35:26PM +0400, Vadim Zhukov wrote: > > Hello all. > > > > Did anyone test bulk build/run of threaded textproc/libxml with recent > > rthreads? Just want to know, if there are any results to avoid > > duplicating work. > > > > Currently libxml is configured --without-threads. New databases/strigi > > wants it, so there is an ugly hack: > > > > --- libstreamanalyzer/lib/saxeventanalyzer.cpp.orig Thu Nov 10 13:28:11 2011 > > +++ libstreamanalyzer/lib/saxeventanalyzer.cpp Thu Nov 10 13:28:35 2011 > > @@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ > > #include <cstring> > > > > #ifndef LIBXML_THREAD_ENABLED > > -#error Strigi needs a thread safe version of libxml2 > > +#warning Strigi needs a thread safe version of libxml2 > > #endif > > > > using namespace Strigi; > > > > -- > > WBR, > > Vadim Zhukov > Isn't kde moving away from strigi ?
Not in 4.9 at least. And 4.9.2@OpenBSD is almost ready.
